Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Comparative Study of 2% Lidocaine Plus 0.5% Ropivacaine Versus 2% Lidocaine Plus 0.5% Bupivacaine for Peribulbar Anaesthesia in Cataract Surgeries

Authors: Susajit Kumar Pradhan; Susanta Kumar Pujahari; Bhupendra Buda; Supriya Pradhan; Smruti Ranjan Muduli;

A Comparative Study of 2% Lidocaine Plus 0.5% Ropivacaine Versus 2% Lidocaine Plus 0.5% Bupivacaine for Peribulbar Anaesthesia in Cataract Surgeries

Abstract

Background: Generally, to perform the Peribulbar anaesthesia, different mixtures of local anaesthetics are used, the most common of which are lidocaine and bupivacaine. It was observed that overdose of bupivacaine proves to be serious because of its cardiotoxic effects. Even more it responded poorly to the traditional resuscitation methods. This study evaluated the efficacy of bupivacaine and ropivacaine. To assess the efficacy hyaluronidase and lidocaine were used to combine the two. Here, for the patients of cataract surgery, two-point injection technique was used for peribulbar anaesthesia. Aim: To assess bupivacaine’s and ropivacaine’s efficacy each of which were combined with hyaluronidase and lidocaine. Material and Methods: It was a randomized double-blind study performed at the Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care at the Srirama Chandra Bhanja Medical College & Hospital in Cuttack during the period of October 2014-16 on sixty patients admitted for cataract surgery in the peribulbar division. Group A of 30 patients received 3ml of 0.5% ropivacaine plus 4ml of 2% lidocaine plus 22.5 International Unit (IU) of Hyaluronidase, and Group B of 30 patients received 3ml of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 4ml of 2% lidocaine plus 22.5 International Unit (IU) of Hyaluronidase. Results: The study found significant difference in Onset of akinesia (mins) between two groups (p<0.001). Further, in Group A, there was no highly significant change in intraocular pressure after peribulbar anaesthesia, whereas highly significant increase in intra ocular pressure was observed when compared to preoperative value in Group B. The intraocular pressure and duration of akinesia was significant in the Group B than in Group A. The study further recorded a significant difference in the onset of analgesia between Group A and Group B (p<0.00). Conclusion: On basis of the study, it was concluded that bupivacaine + lignocaine is an inferior alternative to ropivacaine + lignocaine for treating patients with peribulbar anaesthesia to be used in cataract surgeries. This was because of the reason that it has better efficacy without any type of cardiovascular toxicity.

Background: Generally, to perform the Peribulbar anaesthesia, different mixtures of local anaesthetics are used, the most common of which are lidocaine and bupivacaine. It was observed that overdose of bupivacaine proves to be serious because of its cardiotoxic effects. Even more it responded poorly to the traditional resuscitation methods. This study evaluated the efficacy of bupivacaine and ropivacaine. To assess the efficacy hyaluronidase and lidocaine were used to combine the two. Here, for the patients of cataract surgery, two-point injection technique was used for peribulbar anaesthesia. Aim: To assess bupivacaine’s and ropivacaine’s efficacy each of which were combined with hyaluronidase and lidocaine. Material and Methods: It was a randomized double-blind study performed at the Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care at the Srirama Chandra Bhanja Medical College & Hospital in Cuttack during the period of October 2014-16 on sixty patients admitted for cataract surgery in the peribulbar division. Group A of 30 patients received 3ml of 0.5% ropivacaine plus 4ml of 2% lidocaine plus 22.5 International Unit (IU) of Hyaluronidase, and Group B of 30 patients received 3ml of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 4ml of 2% lidocaine plus 22.5 International Unit (IU) of Hyaluronidase. Results: The study found significant difference in Onset of akinesia (mins) between two groups (p<0.001). Further, in Group A, there was no highly significant change in intraocular pressure after peribulbar anaesthesia, whereas highly significant increase in intra ocular pressure was observed when compared to preoperative value in Group B. The intraocular pressure and duration of akinesia was significant in the Group B than in Group A. The study further recorded a significant difference in the onset of analgesia between Group A and Group B (p<0.00). Conclusion: On basis of the study, it was concluded that bupivacaine + lignocaine is an inferior alternative to ropivacaine + lignocaine for treating patients with peribulbar anaesthesia to be used in cataract surgeries. This was because of the reason that it has better efficacy without any type of cardiovascular toxicity.

Keywords

Ropivacaine, Bupivacaine, Cataract Surgeries

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities