Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Conference object . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Conference object . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Building a Community of Practice for "Big Science" Organizations

Authors: Hasan, Mahedi; Kee, Kerk F; Deelman, Ewa;

Building a Community of Practice for "Big Science" Organizations

Abstract

This work explores the development and implementation of Communities of Practice (CoP) within “Big Science” Organizations. A CoP is a group of professionals who share a common interest, profession, or passion and actively engage in collaborative learning and knowledge sharing (Wenger, 1998). In the context of “big science” (e.g., large-scale observatories), a CoP plays a crucial role in fostering collaboration, enhancing knowledge exchange, and driving innovation across multiple facilities, especially in the domain of cyberinfrastructure (CI). Based on 23 interviews conducted with directors, project staff, technical staff, and scientists across various “big science” organizations funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) called Major Facilities (MFs), we used the grounded theory approach (Corbin & Strauss, 1990) as our method to analyze the data. We found eight themes that describe what MFs do to build a CoP: identifying common interests and challenges, promoting knowledge sharing, organizing guest sessions, providing networking opportunities, creating an inclusive environment, facilitating collaborative projects, and exploring new partnerships.

Keywords

Big Science Organizations, NSF Major Facilities, Open Science, Community of Practice, Cyberinfrastructure, NSF CI Compass, CI Compass, Community Building

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green