
Today, translation in India, is a huge creative industry, that puts to practiceall kinds of lexical conversions across languages and media. However, thetransformation or re-production of a text from a source language to anytarget language can be of various kinds, literal or idiomatic, direct oressential and there can be no absolute principle to call one good or bad.However, in this whole process, what is most debated is thepresence/absence, in-/visibility questions of the translator as anartist/author. Thus, this paper attempts to undertake brief research into thevarious kinds of translations and related theories that often contradict eachother so as to trivialize or prioritize the presence of a translator; with thesupport of some observations around common examples of translationsand the anomalies and perfections they achieve. The paper therebyattempts to open up some common questions around translation as acreative activity and how the translator is lost and found in it. Keywords: translation, strategies, untranslatability, lexical, idiomatic.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
