
FIGURES 30–35. Details of some differential characters between Ulota luteola (30–32) and U. pygmaeothecia (33–35). 30. Exothecial bands with straight cell walls. 31. General view of exostome teeth. Note that every pair of corresponding figures are at the same scale, showing that teeth of U. luteola are usually shorter than those of U. pygmaeothecia. 32. General view and ornamentation of endostome segment. 33. Exothecial bands with sinuous cell walls. 34 General view of exostome teeth. 35. General view and ornamentation of endostome segment. 30–32 from Shevock 37413; 33, 35 Garilleti 2012-003; 34 from Garilleti 2012-080B.
Published as part of Muñoz-Puelles, Laura, Lara, Francisco, Mazimpaka, Vicente & Garilleti, Ricardo, 2017, Vindication of Ulota pygmaeothecia (Orthotrichaceae, Bryophyta), pp. 161-174 in Phytotaxa 317 (3) on page 168, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.317.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/13698666
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
