
This dataset represents survey data on sufficiency-oriented policy acceptability in regard to dietary consumption. The study was part of the second round surveys in Denmark in 2023 within the FULFILL project - Fundamental Decarbonisation Through Sufficiency By Lifestyle Changes. As part of Work Package 3 (WP3) in the FULFILL project, we collected quantitative data from two countries: Denmark and Germany, with representative sampling (age, income, gender, current region). In this survey on the acceptability of sufficiency-oriented diet policies we recruited a representative sample with approximately 800 participants from Denmark and Germany, taking into account primarily the individual perspective, added by some questions on the household level. The central part of the survey includes a framing experiment including three groups with participants being randomly assigned to. We were interested in peoples' acceptability on three majorly discussed and sufficiency-relevant policies, i.e. meat tax, carbon label or meat-free day at public canteens. We investigated if an information on either the efficacy of the measures or a combination of information with acceptance information or none of these information could influence people's acceptability (overall, self vs. others perspective). We measured several control variables (socio-economics such as age, gender, income, education, household size, life stage, ideological measures such as political orientation or attitudinal measures such as sufficiency orientation and climate change denial). A quantitative assessment of the carbon footprint in the food consumption domain was also included.
meat tax, framing experiment, carbon label, sufficiency, policy acceptability, meat-free day, meat consumption
meat tax, framing experiment, carbon label, sufficiency, policy acceptability, meat-free day, meat consumption
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
