
FIGURE 6. Comparison of anatomy of various parts and pollen grains of Boesenbergia meghalayensis (A, C, E, G, I, K, M, O & Q) and B. rotunda (B, D, F, H, J, L, N, P & R). A & B. T.S of midrib (towards base). C & D. T.S of midrib (towards tip). E & F. Lamina. G & H. Margin. I & J. Sheath. K & L. Petiole. M & N. Petiole margin. O & P. Epidermal peeling (abaxial surface) and Q & R. Pollen. (Inset in A. Oil cell in B. meghalayansis. M & N. Petiole margins- portion enlarged).
Published as part of Vinitha, M.R., Thomas, George & Sabu, M., 2015, A new species of Boesenbergia and rediscovery of B. rotunda (Zingiberaceae) from India, pp. 186-196 in Phytotaxa 197 (3) on page 194, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.197.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/13640685
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
