
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>As part of my master’s thesis in Library and Information Science, I’ve asked archivists and librarians about the current state of email archiving from personal collections. The distribution channels were six relevant professional mailing lists of German-speaking countries. The aim was to reach at least members of the KOOP-LITEARA international network from Austria, Germany, Luxembourg and Switzerland. Thankfully, the survey was opened more than 180 times; 115 questionnaires could be analysed. Respondents worked in academic institutions, governmental institutions, etc. About half of the respondents stated that their institutions had a long-term archive for digital records in place. The five biggest challenges especially of email archiving, identified through qualitative methods (survey coding) were: the amount of data, legal issues and protection periods, the original structure of email archives, precustodial contact with records creators and setting up a technical infrastructure. However, one important challenge has rarely been addressed – communication with users. Restrictions on rights hinder accessibility, but couldn't at least pilot projects be launched to test working with email collections? Nevertheless, technology is on the move! 11 respondents reported that they are already working with specialised software such as ePADD. The time is ripe. This description also serves as the audio transcript of the mp3 file listed below.
Library sciences
Library sciences
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
