Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Landscape diversity is correlated with satellite-sensed primary productivity in North America

Authors: Mayor, Sarah; Altermatt, Florian; Crowther, Tom W.; Hordijk, Iris; Landauer, Simon; Oehri, Jacqueline; Reji Chacko, Merin; +3 Authors

Landscape diversity is correlated with satellite-sensed primary productivity in North America

Abstract

Data was collected by processing satellite-remote sensing products collected with the MODIS instrument, at 250m pixel resolution. Land-cover type information was extracted at 30-m spatial resolution from the Commission for Environmental Cooperation's North American Land Monitoring System's map (CEC map, based on Landsat-7 satellite imagery), and from the global GlobeLand30 map (GLC map, based on Landsat-5 and China Environmental Disaster Alleviation Satellite (HJ-1) imagery). We focused on the land covers forest, grassland, shrubland, agriculture, wetland and urban, combining the different forest types distinguished in the CEC map. Study plots were selected across North America to form a quasi-experimental study design with 3x6° latutude x longitude tiles that were further divided into 16 ecoregions. Within each tile x ecoregion combination, parallel experimental sub-designs spanning gradients in land-cover type richness were formed. Plots were selected so that land-cover type richness was orthogonal with the average area fraction of each land-cover type found at each richness level, and so that the richness gradient was orthogonal with important environmental factors such as altitude. As productivity metric, we used MODIS EVI indices from the Terra satellite (years 2000-2019) and fitted harmonic time series to the data based on Fourier synthesis to model annual phenology curves.

Biodiversity-ecosystem functioning (BEF) experiments have established generally positive species richness-productivity relationships in plots of single ecosystem types. Here, we analyzed effects of landscape-level diversity, measured as the number of land-cover types (different ecosystems) per 250 × 250 m, across all of North America. We find that this metric is positively related to landscape-wide remotely-sensed primary production, and that a higher number of land-cover types also is associated with greater temporal stability of productivity, and with accelerated 20-year greening trends, in particular at high latitudes. Species diversity was correlated with landscape-level productivity, but the effect of species diversity and landscape diversity were independent. This indicates that diversity-functioning patterns resembling the ones at smaller scales also exist at higher levels of biological organization.

Funding provided by: University of ZurichROR ID: https://ror.org/02crff812Award Number: URPP GCB

Keywords

land cover, NDVI, Ecological productivity, Biodiversity, Remote sensing, Spatial and landscape ecology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average