Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Prospective Observational Identification of the Most Common Etiologies and the Frequent Stage of Presentation in Patients with Neovascular Glaucoma

Authors: Sunil Kumar; Sujata Kumari;

A Prospective Observational Identification of the Most Common Etiologies and the Frequent Stage of Presentation in Patients with Neovascular Glaucoma

Abstract

Aim: To identify the most common cause and the frequent stage of presentation in patients with neovascular glaucoma. Material & Methods: The present study is a prospective observational study, 460 patients with Glaucoma of multiple type and of etiology underwent detail ophthalmological examination and 16 case those have been diagnosed as neovascular glaucoma (NVG) in one eye or both the eyes at Department of ophthalmology, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India over a period of 13 months were included in the study, with prevalence of 3.5% of all glaucoma cases. Results: Most of the patients i.e., 11 (68.8%) presented in rubeosis iridis stage, 3 (18.75%) in open angle stage and 02 (12.5%) in angle closure stage. The Mean IOP in Angle closure stage was found significantly higher than the mean IOP in other two stages (P = 0.001). Conclusion: In the present study, it was found although prevalence of NVG is significantly low among cases of all glaucoma but the rising trend of Diabetic in population is of concern and this study also confirms that more than half of the cases of NVG were found with Proliferative diabetic retinopathy is the most common cause and rubeosis iridis stage was the commonest finding.

Aim: To identify the most common cause and the frequent stage of presentation in patients with neovascular glaucoma. Material & Methods: The present study is a prospective observational study, 460 patients with Glaucoma of multiple type and of etiology underwent detail ophthalmological examination and 16 case those have been diagnosed as neovascular glaucoma (NVG) in one eye or both the eyes at Department of ophthalmology, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India over a period of 13 months were included in the study, with prevalence of 3.5% of all glaucoma cases. Results: Most of the patients i.e., 11 (68.8%) presented in rubeosis iridis stage, 3 (18.75%) in open angle stage and 02 (12.5%) in angle closure stage. The Mean IOP in Angle closure stage was found significantly higher than the mean IOP in other two stages (P = 0.001). Conclusion: In the present study, it was found although prevalence of NVG is significantly low among cases of all glaucoma but the rising trend of Diabetic in population is of concern and this study also confirms that more than half of the cases of NVG were found with Proliferative diabetic retinopathy is the most common cause and rubeosis iridis stage was the commonest finding.

Related Organizations
Keywords

neovascular glaucoma, Secondary Glaucoma rubeosis iridis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities