Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Prospective Study on Anti-Helicobacter Pylori Therapy and Endoscopic Biopsy Following Surgery in Cases of Peptic Perforation

Authors: Sulata Choudhury; V Rajesh; Siba Prasad Dash; Jitendra Dalai;

Prospective Study on Anti-Helicobacter Pylori Therapy and Endoscopic Biopsy Following Surgery in Cases of Peptic Perforation

Abstract

Background: The most common causes of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) are Helicobacter pylori infection and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and the PUD leads to perforation. Perforation of gastric or duodenal ulcer is one of the most serious and overwhelming catastrophes that can befall on human being. The incidence of peptic ulcer disease has decline in worldwide in recent years following judicious use of wide spectrum and highly effective ulcer healing drugs. Despite the widespread use of gastric antisecretory agents and H. pylori eradication therapy the incidence of perforated peptic ulcer has changed little. Aim: The current study aims to check the involvement of the H. pylori in peptic perforations and whether by eradicating the bacterium H. pylori can we prevent the ulcer recurrence in post operative peptic perforation patients. Materials and Methods: After the confirmation of peptic perforation and detecting the H. pylori infection patients were subjected to graham’s repair by both open and laparoscopic method. Then after recovery they were included in the trial category. This study also involves the comparison between effectiveness of triple therapy regimen over esomeprazole alone therapy in post-operative periods. The patients were advised to follow up upto 1 year and ulcer recurrence was observed. Results: Study was conducted on 128 patients, out of which 68 were excluded and remaining 60 patients were included in the study. 30 patients were included in triple therapy group and 30 to only esomeprazole therapy group. After 1 yr. follow up it was found that 25(83.3%) out of 30 patients and 5(16.6%) out of 30 patients has H. pylori eradication. Ulcer recurrence occurred 3.3% in case triple therapy and 36.6% in case of only esomeprazole therapy. Conclusions: In this study it was found that in cases of peptic perforations triple therapy (anti- helicobacter pylori therapy) is superior to esomeprazole alone in the eradication of H. pylori. Triple therapy also prevents long term recurrence of ulcer in post operative peptic perforation in 1 year follow up study.

Background: The most common causes of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) are Helicobacter pylori infection and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and the PUD leads to perforation. Perforation of gastric or duodenal ulcer is one of the most serious and overwhelming catastrophes that can befall on human being. The incidence of peptic ulcer disease has decline in worldwide in recent years following judicious use of wide spectrum and highly effective ulcer healing drugs. Despite the widespread use of gastric antisecretory agents and H. pylori eradication therapy the incidence of perforated peptic ulcer has changed little. Aim: The current study aims to check the involvement of the H. pylori in peptic perforations and whether by eradicating the bacterium H. pylori can we prevent the ulcer recurrence in post operative peptic perforation patients. Materials and Methods: After the confirmation of peptic perforation and detecting the H. pylori infection patients were subjected to graham’s repair by both open and laparoscopic method. Then after recovery they were included in the trial category. This study also involves the comparison between effectiveness of triple therapy regimen over esomeprazole alone therapy in post-operative periods. The patients were advised to follow up upto 1 year and ulcer recurrence was observed. Results: Study was conducted on 128 patients, out of which 68 were excluded and remaining 60 patients were included in the study. 30 patients were included in triple therapy group and 30 to only esomeprazole therapy group. After 1 yr. follow up it was found that 25(83.3%) out of 30 patients and 5(16.6%) out of 30 patients has H. pylori eradication. Ulcer recurrence occurred 3.3% in case triple therapy and 36.6% in case of only esomeprazole therapy. Conclusions: In this study it was found that in cases of peptic perforations triple therapy (anti- helicobacter pylori therapy) is superior to esomeprazole alone in the eradication of H. pylori. Triple therapy also prevents long term recurrence of ulcer in post operative peptic perforation in 1 year follow up study.

Keywords

Acid suppression therapy, Graham's omental patch, H. pylori, Malignancy, Perforated peptic ulcer, Peritonitis, Triple therapy, Ulcer recurrence, Vagotomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities