Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Image . 2005
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Image . 2005
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Image . 2005
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Fig. 1 in Nanostructure of biogenic versus abiogenic calcium carbonate crystals

Authors: Stolarski, Jarosław; Mazur, Maciej;

Fig. 1 in Nanostructure of biogenic versus abiogenic calcium carbonate crystals

Abstract

Fig. 1. Synthetic aragonite crystals. Seven day old cluster of acicular aragonite crystals, overall (A) and close−up (B) views. Two day old cluster of acicular aragonite (C) with growth steps (D). No distinct nanograins are recognizable on crystal surface before and after (E–H) treatment with oxidizing solution. AFM (contact mode; buffered pH = 8, ammonium persulfate 1%, 10 min.): height−2D projection (E, G), and deflection (F, H) images of 1×1 µm (E, F) and 500×500 nm (G, H) crystal face. Grayscale bars (left) show z−scale (height) of 2D projection images.

Published as part of Stolarski, Jarosław & Mazur, Maciej, 2005, Nanostructure of biogenic versus abiogenic calcium carbonate crystals, pp. 847-865 in Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 50 (4) on page 850, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13625333

Keywords

Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average