Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Cadaveric Study of Anatomical Variations of Renal Arteries

Authors: Randhir Kumar; Chandra Kiran; Rajendra Prasad;

Cadaveric Study of Anatomical Variations of Renal Arteries

Abstract

Background: Understanding the anatomical variations of renal arteries is crucial for preventing complications during renal transplant surgeries, angiographic procedures, and other renal interventions. Aim: This study aims to document and analyze the variations in the renal arteries observed in human cadavers. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted at the Department of Anatomy, Anugrah Narayan Magadh Medical College, Gaya.. Eighty-three cadavers (166 kidneys) were included based on intact renal systems and exclusion of those with prior renal surgeries or significant postmortem deterioration. Renal arteries were dissected and traced from their origin at the abdominal aorta to their entry points into the kidneys. Data were collected on the number, origin, and entry points of the renal arteries. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 21.0, employing descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests to compare variations by laterality and sex, with a significance level set at p<0.05. Results: The study found that anatomical variations in renal arteries occurred in 62.65% of cadavers, with accessory renal arteries being the most common variation (28.92%). Variations were more frequent on the right side (34.93%) compared to the left (25.30%), and there was no significant difference between male and female cadavers. These findings highlight the importance of recognizing renal artery variations in surgical planning to minimize complications. Conclusion: Prior knowledge of renal artery variations is essential to prevent surgical and angiographic complications. The study underscores the importance of incorporating this knowledge into clinical practice to enhance the safety and efficiency of renal-related procedures. Recommendations: Further research should continue to document these variations in different populations and settings to refine surgical techniques and improve patient outcomes. Clinicians should consider preoperative imaging to identify these variations before performing any renal interventions.

Background: Understanding the anatomical variations of renal arteries is crucial for preventing complications during renal transplant surgeries, angiographic procedures, and other renal interventions. Aim: This study aims to document and analyze the variations in the renal arteries observed in human cadavers. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted at the Department of Anatomy, Anugrah Narayan Magadh Medical College, Gaya.. Eighty-three cadavers (166 kidneys) were included based on intact renal systems and exclusion of those with prior renal surgeries or significant postmortem deterioration. Renal arteries were dissected and traced from their origin at the abdominal aorta to their entry points into the kidneys. Data were collected on the number, origin, and entry points of the renal arteries. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 21.0, employing descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests to compare variations by laterality and sex, with a significance level set at p<0.05. Results: The study found that anatomical variations in renal arteries occurred in 62.65% of cadavers, with accessory renal arteries being the most common variation (28.92%). Variations were more frequent on the right side (34.93%) compared to the left (25.30%), and there was no significant difference between male and female cadavers. These findings highlight the importance of recognizing renal artery variations in surgical planning to minimize complications. Conclusion: Prior knowledge of renal artery variations is essential to prevent surgical and angiographic complications. The study underscores the importance of incorporating this knowledge into clinical practice to enhance the safety and efficiency of renal-related procedures. Recommendations: Further research should continue to document these variations in different populations and settings to refine surgical techniques and improve patient outcomes. Clinicians should consider preoperative imaging to identify these variations before performing any renal interventions.

Keywords

Renal arteries, Accessory renal artery, Anatomical variations, Renal transplant, Surgical complications

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities