Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Effect of Varying Time Interval between Fentanyl and Propofol Administration, On Propofol Requirement for Induction of Anaesthesia

Authors: Pranitha. D; C.N. Ramesh; S. B. Gangadhar;

Effect of Varying Time Interval between Fentanyl and Propofol Administration, On Propofol Requirement for Induction of Anaesthesia

Abstract

Introduction: Fentanyl synergistically enhances propofol effects and reduces hemodynamic response during induction. Fentanyl and propofol administration timing affects propofol dose and associated side effects. Aim and Objectives: Primary objective is to calculate the total dose of propofol required to achieve loss of consciousness during induction of anesthesia. Secondary objective is to examine the Incidence of hypotension during induction and to examine any Incidence of any movement or Bucking or Any vocalization after initial dose of propofol. Materials & Methods: After institutional ethical clearance, 68 ASA status I & II patients, aged 18-65 years, undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomized into two groups; Fentanyl 2 mcg/kg was administered immediately prior to, 5 and 7 min before induction with propofol in Groups A and B, respectively. The requirement of propofol induction dose and hemodynamic parameters was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using software SPSS, P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Demographic characteristics were comparable in both the groups. Total dose of propofol required for induction was higher in Groups A than group B (Group A vs. 85.88±14.221mg vs. 56.52±12.530 mg). Incidence of movement, vocalization, bucking is higher in Group A than Group B (P=<0.000001, P=0.002, P=0.007 respectively). Incidence of hypotension during induction was significantly lower in Group B (5.9%) than Group A (94.1%; P =<0.00001). Conclusion: Administering fentanyl 7 min prior to propofol causes marked reduction in the dose requirement of the propofol along with a significantly decreased incidence of hypotension during induction.

Introduction: Fentanyl synergistically enhances propofol effects and reduces hemodynamic response during induction. Fentanyl and propofol administration timing affects propofol dose and associated side effects. Aim and Objectives: Primary objective is to calculate the total dose of propofol required to achieve loss of consciousness during induction of anesthesia. Secondary objective is to examine the Incidence of hypotension during induction and to examine any Incidence of any movement or Bucking or Any vocalization after initial dose of propofol. Materials & Methods: After institutional ethical clearance, 68 ASA status I & II patients, aged 18-65 years, undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomized into two groups; Fentanyl 2 mcg/kg was administered immediately prior to, 5 and 7 min before induction with propofol in Groups A and B, respectively. The requirement of propofol induction dose and hemodynamic parameters was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using software SPSS, P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Demographic characteristics were comparable in both the groups. Total dose of propofol required for induction was higher in Groups A than group B (Group A vs. 85.88±14.221mg vs. 56.52±12.530 mg). Incidence of movement, vocalization, bucking is higher in Group A than Group B (P=<0.000001, P=0.002, P=0.007 respectively). Incidence of hypotension during induction was significantly lower in Group B (5.9%) than Group A (94.1%; P =<0.00001). Conclusion: Administering fentanyl 7 min prior to propofol causes marked reduction in the dose requirement of the propofol along with a significantly decreased incidence of hypotension during induction.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Anesthesia; Fentanyl; Hemodynamic parameters; Propofol

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities