Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Callia axillaris

Authors: Olivier, Renan Da Silva; Santos-Silva, Antonio; Monné, Marcela Laura; Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica;

Callia axillaris

Abstract

Callia axillaris (Dalman, 1823) (Fig. 54) Lamia axillaris Dalman, 1823: 69. Lamia axillaris Germar, 1823: 485. Callia axillaris Germar, 1839: 330. Callia (Callia) axillaris; Bates, 1885: 423. Callia flavofemorata Laporte, 1840: 486. Callia (Callia) flavofemorata; Aurivillius, 1923: 600. Callia pulchra Melzer, 1930: 206. Callia (Callia) pulchra; Zajciw, 1958: 57. Remarks. Lamia axillaris was described based a single specimen from Brazil. In the same year, Germar (1823) described the same species with the same name, based on a single specimen also from Brazil. Germar (1839) observed the homonymy and reported: “643. Lamia axillaris, Callia. M. Dalmann [sic] l’a décrit sous le meme nom [Mr. Dalman described it with the same name].” Germar (1839) did not indicate which name had priority because he considered his description as published in 1824, only indicating the synonymy. However, according to Bousquet (2016): “Despite that the title page is dated 1824, this book was published by October 1823. Ersch (1828: 1166) dated the book 1823.” Bousquet (2016) informed on the work by Dalman (1823): “ Analecta entomologica. Cum tabulis IV aeneis. J.P. Lindh, Holmiae [= Stockholm]. vii + 104 + [4 (Index)] + 4 pls. (4to) [DP: 1823 (title page), 7 September 1823 (Evenhuis 1997a: 190), September 1823 (Not Geb Natur), December 1823 (Isis, Heft XII: [2])] CNC, GB.” Therefore, assuming that the information from Bousquet (2016) is reliable, Lamia axillaris Germar is a junior synonym of Lamia axillaris Dalman. Callia flavofemorata was described based on a single specimen from Brazil; and Callia pulchra was described based on specimens from Brazil (Paraná, Santa Catarina). Monné & Giesbert (1992) synonymized C. flavofemorata with C. axillaris; and Wappes & Santos-Silva (2020) synonymized C. pulchra with C. axillaris. Currently, it is known from Brazil (Bahia, Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Paraná, Santa Catarina, and Rio Grande do Sul), Bolivia (Santa Cruz and Tarija), Paraguay, Argentina (Tucumán, Misiones, and Corrientes), and Uruguay (Monné 2024b). Material examined. BRAZIL, Mato Grosso do Sul (new state record): Campo Grande, CNPGC [Centro Nacional de Pesquisas de Gado de Corte—EMBRAPA], 1 male (MNRJ-ENT-47653), 16.XII.1976, W.W. Koller leg. (MNRJ).

Published as part of Olivier, Renan Da Silva, Santos-Silva, Antonio, Monné, Marcela Laura & Costa-Pinto, Paula Jéssica, 2024, Notes, new records, and transference in South American Cerambycidae (Insecta, Coleoptera), pp. 451-499 in Zootaxa 5496 (4) on page 481, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5496.4.1, http://zenodo.org/record/13617630

Keywords

Coleoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Cerambycidae, Animalia, Callia axillaris, Biodiversity, Callia, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average