
This article studies the relationship between the degree of populist or pluralist rhetoric employed by governments, and how it affects the perception of anticorruption effectiveness from its citizens. By combining data from the 2021 Global Corruption Barometer survey and from the 2020 Global Party Survey, a consolidated dataset is created, including information on the degree of populist rhetoric employed, corruption approval scores, as well as socio-demographic and country-level data for each ruling government from the 47 countries. Using multilevel logistic regression analysis of the 52,925 responses from 47 countries in the dataset, the article determines that pluralist governments have higher odds of being perceived as better at handling corruption, by comparison to populist governments.
Corruption, Populism, anticorruption policies, Global Party Survey, Global Corruption Barometer
Corruption, Populism, anticorruption policies, Global Party Survey, Global Corruption Barometer
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
