
The "sessile drop" method for determining the surface energy of solids - γ is considered. For graphite and graphene, this method yielded average values of γ2 = 53.6 ± 2.1 and γ1 = 44.8 ± 14.7 mJ/m2. The crystal cleavage method for graphite yielded an average value of γ2 = 3250 mJ/m2, which is 60 times higher than the γ2 value obtained by the "sessile drop" method. Analysis of both methods showed that the "sessile drop" method for determining the surface energy of solids cannot be used without modification. We propose new methods for determining the surface energy of solids: 1) through the melting point of the solid; 2) through the size dependence of a physical property on the thickness of the deposited coating; 3) through the measured value of the contact potential difference. The following values were obtained for graphene: γ1 = 947.1; γ1 = 960 mJ/m2, which is an order of magnitude higher than in the "sessile drop" method. The values of γ1 should be multiplied by 3 and we obtain the values for graphite - γ2 = 2841; γ2 = 2922, γ2 = 2880 mJ/m2, which differs slightly from the crystal splitting method.
graphite, graphene, surface energy, sessile drop method, crystal cleavage, solid.
graphite, graphene, surface energy, sessile drop method, crystal cleavage, solid.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
