
(Uploaded by Plazi for the Bat Literature Project) The classical Poisson, geometric and negative binomial regression models for count data belong to the family of generalized linear models and are available at the core of the statistics toolbox in the R system for statistical computing. After reviewing the conceptual and computational features of these methods, a new implementation of hurdle and zero-inflated regression models in the functions hurdle() and zeroinfl() from the package pscl is introduced. It re-uses design and functionality of the basic R functions just as the underlying conceptual tools extend the classical models. Both hurdle and zeroinflated model, are able to incorporate over-dispersion and excess zeros—two problems that typically occur in count data sets in economics and the social sciences—better than their classical counterparts. Using cross-section data on the demand for medical care, it is illustrated how the classical as well as the zero-augmented models can be fitted, inspected and tested in practice.
Research Report Series / Department of Statistics and Mathematics, Statistics, bats, GLM / Poisson model / negative binomial model / zero-inflated model / hurdle model, bat, Biodiversity, HA1-4737, GLM / Poisson model / negative binomial model / hurdle model / zero-inflated model, RVK QH 234, Chiroptera, Poisson model, Mammalia, Animalia, GLM, negative binomial model, hurdle model, Chordata, zero-inflated model
Research Report Series / Department of Statistics and Mathematics, Statistics, bats, GLM / Poisson model / negative binomial model / zero-inflated model / hurdle model, bat, Biodiversity, HA1-4737, GLM / Poisson model / negative binomial model / hurdle model / zero-inflated model, RVK QH 234, Chiroptera, Poisson model, Mammalia, Animalia, GLM, negative binomial model, hurdle model, Chordata, zero-inflated model
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2K | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
