Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["B. I. Page, Who deliberates?: Mass media in modern democracy.\nChicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.", "J. Gastil (2000), \"Is face-to-face citizen deliberation a luxury or a\nnecessity?\" Political Communication, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 357-361, 2000.", "S. Chambers, \"Rhetoric and the public sphere: has deliberative\ndemocracy abandoned mass democracy?\" Political Theory, doi:\n10.1177/0090591709332336, 2009.", "R.E. Goodin, and J. S. Dryzek, \"Deliberative impacts: the macropolitical\nuptake of mini-publics, Politics & Society, vol. 34, no. 2, pp.\n219-244, 2006.", "S. Niemeyer, \"The emancipatory effect of deliberation: empirical\nlessons from mini-publics\", Politics & Society, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 103-\n140, 2011.", "S. Wright, and J. Street, \"Democracy, deliberation and design: the case\nof online discussion forums\", New Media & Society, vol. 9, no. 5, pp.\n849-869, 2007", "T. Graham, and T, Witschge, \"In search of online deliberation: Towards\na new method for examining the quality of online discussions\",\nCommunications-sankt Augustin then Berlin, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 173-204,\n2003.", "X. Zhou, Y. Y. Chan, and Z. M. Peng, \"Deliberativeness of online\npolitical discussion: A content analysis of the Guangzhou Daily\nwebsite\". Journalism Studies, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 759-770, 2008.", "A. Mitra, \"Marginal voices in cyberspace\", New Media & Society, vol.\n3, no. 1, pp. 29-48, 2001.\n[10] D. Janssen and R. Kies, \"Online forums and deliberative democracy\",\nActa pol\u00edtica, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 317-335, 2004.\n[11] Z. Papacharissi, \"Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the\ndemocratic potential of online political discussion groups\", New Media\n& Society, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 259-283, 2004.\n[12] S. Albrecht, \"Whose voice is heard in online deliberation?: A study of\nparticipation and representation in political debates on the internet\",\nInformation, Community and Society, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 62-82, 2006.\n[13] M. T. Loveland and D. Popescu, \"Democracy on the Web: Assessing the\ndeliberative qualities of Internet forums\", Information, Communication\n& Society, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 684-703, 2011.\n[14] A. G. Wilhelm, \"Virtual sounding boards: How deliberative is on\u2010line\npolitical discussion?\", Information Communication & Society, vol.1, no.\n3, pp. 313-338, 1998.\n[15] S. Wright, \"Politics as usual? Revolution, normalization and a new\nagenda for online deliberation\", New Media & Society, vol. 14, no. 2, pp.\n244-261, 2012.\n[16] L. Dahlberg, \"The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the\nprospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere\",\nInformation, Communication & Society, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 615-633, 2001.\n[17] S. Chambers, Reasonable democracy: Jiirgen Habermas and the politics\nof discourse (Vol. 11). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.\n[18] S. Chambers, \"Deliberative democratic theory\", Annual Review of\nPolitical Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 307-326, 2003.\n[19] S. Iyengar, R. C. Luskin and J. S. Fishkin, \"Facilitating informed public\nopinion: evidence from face-to-face and on-line deliberative polls\",\nPresented at Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc., Philadelphia, 2003.\n[20] J. W. Rhee and E. Kim, \"Deliberation on the Net: Lessons from a Field\nExperiment\". Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice, eds.\nT. Davies and S. P. Gangadharan, 223-232. Stanford, CA: CSLI\nPublications, 2009.\n[21] R. C. Luskin, J. S. Fishkin, and S. Iyengar. \"Considered Opinions on\nU.S. Foreign Policy: Face-to-Face versus Online Deliberative Polling\".\nPaper presented at the International Communication Association, New\nOrleans, LA, 2004\n[22] K. Strandberg and K. Gr\u00f6nlund 2012), \"Online Deliberation and Its\nOutcome\u2014Evidence from the Virtual Polity Experiment\", Journal of\nInformation Technology & Politics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 167-184.\n[23] V. Price, \"Citizens deliberating online: Theory and some evidence\". In\nT. Davies and B. S. Noveck (Eds.), Online deliberation: Research and\npractice (pp. 37\u201358). Chicago: Chicago Universiry Press, 2006.\n[24] M. X. Delli-Carpini, F. L. Cook, and L. R. Jacobs,\"Public deliberation,\ndiscursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the\nempirical literature\". Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., vol. 7, pp. 315-344, 2004\n[25] S. J. Min, \"Online vs. face\u2010to\u2010face deliberation: Effects on civic\nengagement\". Journal of Computer\u2010Mediated Communication, vol. 12,\nno. 4, pp. 1369-1387, 2007.\n[26] K. Gr\u00f6nlund, K.. Strandberg and S. Himmelroos, \"The challenge of\ndeliberative democracy online\u2013A comparison of face-to-face and virtual\nexperiments in citizen deliberation\". Information Polity, vol. 14, no. 3,\npp. 187-201, 2009."]}
In this paper, an experiment was conducted to assess the impact of online deliberation on citizens' attitudes. Specifically, this research compared pre and post deliberation opinions of participants who deliberated online via an asynchronous platform regarding the issue of political opinion polls. Results indicate that online deliberation had a positive effect on citizens' attitudes since it was found that following deliberation participants changed their views regarding public opinion polls. Specifically, online deliberation improved discussants perceptions regarding the reliability of polls, while suppressing their negative views about the misuse of polls by media, polling organizations and politicians.
opinion polls, e-democracy., Online deliberation, attitudes change
opinion polls, e-democracy., Online deliberation, attitudes change
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts