Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

ArtPlaces

Authors: Liu, Shumei; Huang, Haiting; Zinnen, Mathias; Christlein, Vincent;
Abstract

Olfaction, often overlooked in cultural heritage studies, holds profound significance in shaping human experiences and identities. Examining historical depictions of olfactory scenes can offer valuable insights into the role of smells in history. To address the challenge of domain shift between natural images and artistic representations of fragrant spaces, we introduce novel scene-centric artistic datasets, RASD and WASD, comprising 704 and 3691 artworks respectively, constructed by querying two cultural heritage data sources, Rijksmuseum and Wikidata, and using the search terms as supervision signals. Additionally, Fragrant-Places dataset is created by manually reviewing all artworks of the ODOR dataset, consisting of 228 artworks. Furthermore, this complete set of ArtPlaces data is splited into ArtPlace_Train and ArtPlaces-test. ArtPlaces-test includes Fragrant-Places as well as a manually corrected portion of RASD and WASD. ArtPlace_Train contains the remaining sections of RASD and WASD. We show that a transfer-learning approach using weakly labeled training data can remarkably improve the classification of fragrant spaces and, more generally, artistic scene depictions. The models are evaluated on the two manually corrected test splits, Fragrant-Places and ArtPlaces-test. This work lays a foundation for further exploration of fragrant spaces recognition and artistic scene classification.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average