Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Prioritization, Iteration, and Convergence in Cognitive Systems_ Bayesian Inference, Perceptual Gating, and the Requirement Equation

Authors: Nelson, Benjamin;

Prioritization, Iteration, and Convergence in Cognitive Systems_ Bayesian Inference, Perceptual Gating, and the Requirement Equation

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents potential avenues for prioritizing sense data by mimicking the perceptual gating function in biological systems. The prioritization, iteration, and convergence of sense data incorporates Robert Worden’s Requirement Equation (Worden, 2024) to dynamically update prior and posterior beliefs. These attempts are informed and guided by Active Inference (Parr, et. al. 2022) and follow high and low roads to Active Inference (Figure 1) (Parr, et. al. 2022). The integration of the Requirement Equation (RE) enables adaptive decision-making by aligning prioritization with fitness calculations based on Bayesian inference. This methodology not only calculates the fitness of a state-action pair based on the Requirement Equation, it refines output accuracy maximizing overall decision fitness. This research includes detailed equations, optimization objectives, and practical implementation examples. Keywords: Perceptual Gating, Requirement Equation (RE), Fitness Maximization, Attention Allocation, Gradient Calculations, Adaptive Feedback, Decision Criteria, Bayesian Inference Introduction In cognitive systems, effective decision-making relies on the ability to prioritize relevant information while minimizing the impact of computational errors. This paper introduces a novel model for prioritizing prior and posterior beliefs through perceptual gating. The core concept involves adjusting the output by incorporating a perceptual gating weight and a noise reduction weight to enhance the accuracy of processed information. In this prioritization equation ( O ) represents the fitness output, ( G(I, B) ) denote the perceptual gating function, (wg) and (wn) symbolize weights for perceptual gating and noise reduction, respectively, and ( N ) represents computational noise. The model's optimization objective is to minimize the error between the desired and actual outputs by iteratively adjusting parameters such as beliefs and weights. To further enhance decision-making, the Requirement Equation (RE) is integrated, guiding the model with fitness calculations derived from Bayesian inference. This integration ensures that prioritization aligns with the expected fitness of actions based on sensory data and state transitions. The paper explores the functionality of this integrated approach, including its implementation in system architecture, resource allocation, and adaptive decision-making. Examples are provided along with theoretical underpinnings, highlighting the complex synergy between perceptual gating, iteration, convergence, and the Requirement Equation to guide cognitive processes across mechanisms. The proposed model attempts a robust scaffolding for improving cognitive performance by refining belief prioritization and optimizing decision-making efficiency.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average