Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
 View all 2 versions
Claim

Good Practices in Editorial Process for Scientific Journals Indexed in LILACS

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Presentation , Other literature type 21 Aug 2024 English Publisher:Zenodo
Authors: Heredia, Ana;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13356661 , 10.5281/zenodo.13356662

Good Practices in Editorial Process for Scientific Journals Indexed in LILACS

Abstract

August 20rd, 2024Strengthening Health Information Networks in Caribbean Virtual Health Library (VHL) Coordination: Márcia Barretto, BIREME/PAHO/WHO Opening remarks:Márcia Barretto, BIREME/PAHO/WHOVictoria Cruickshank-Taylor, Regional Coordinator of MedCarib Network The 2024 calendar of sessionsVerônica Abdala, BIREME/PAHO/WHO Best Practices in Editorial Process for Scientific Journals Indexed in LILACS: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in editorial process of scientific journals Ana Heredia, PhD

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Knowmad Institut