
Andrena (Euandrena) rufula Schmiedeknecht, 1884 Andrena rufula Schmiedeknecht, 1882 –1884: 592, ♀ ♂ [France, NMW, lectotype by present designation] (Figures 26A–D) Remarks. Schmiedeknecht (1882 –1884) described several Andrena species that he received from Jean Pérez, and type material for many of them has been considered lost (Gusenleitner & Schwarz 2002). Wood (2023b; e) located some of these specimens in the RMNH collection, and designated lectotypes. A further species, A. rufula, was located in the NMW collection, with a male and female that are clearly marked as coming from Pérez from Bordeaux, the stated type locality. The female specimen is designated as the lectotype in order to confirm its true location. In the NMW archive, there are around 50 letters of correspondence between Schmiedeknecht and Franz Kohl (1851–†1924), the Hymenoptera curator at the NMW in the late 19 th and early 20 th centuries. No specific reference to this specimen could be found, but a statement by Kohl from 10 th November 1916 (item 14/6/15) was found indicating that Schmiedeknecht sold hundreds of bee specimens to the museum, and it may therefore have been transferred to the NMW at this time. Material examined. FRANCE: Bordeaux, 1884, 1♂, 1♀, leg. J. Pérez, NMW (female lectotype, by present designation; male syntype).
Published as part of WOOD, T. J., 2024, Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae), pp. 1-150 in Zootaxa 5483 (1) on pages 43-44, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/13209307
Andrenidae, Insecta, Arthropoda, Andrena, Animalia, Biodiversity, Andrena rufula, Hymenoptera, Taxonomy
Andrenidae, Insecta, Arthropoda, Andrena, Animalia, Biodiversity, Andrena rufula, Hymenoptera, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
