
This dataset provides the global spatial distribution of primary and secondary vegetation at approx. 1km spatial resolution (0.01°). It combines Hilda+ landuse/cover data by Winkler et al. (2020) and the global dataset on human influence by Riggio et al. (2020). The data consists of three NetCDF files: Primary vegetation Primary vegetation minimal use Secondary vegetation Primary vegetation is assigned where forests, unmanaged grass-/ shrubland or land with sparse vegetation according to the HILDA+ dataset (classes 44, 55, 66) are under full agreement of very low human influence according to the global dataset on human influence. The same HILDA+ classes (44, 55, 66) with full agreement to be under low human influence according to Riggion et al. (2020) are defined as primary vegetation minimal use. Secondary vegetation consists of forests, unmanaged grass-/ shrubland or land with sparse vegetation according to the Hilda+ dataset (classes 44, 55, 66) that are not classified as primary vegetation. Sources: Winkler, K., Fuchs, R., Rounsevell, M. D. A., Herold, M. (2020): HILDA+ Global Land Use Change between 1960 and 2019. PANGAEA. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.921846 Riggio, J. et al. (2020): Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth’s remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems. Dryad. https://doi.org/10.25338/B80G7Z This seperation of primary and secondary vegetation has been used e.g. in the following studies: Schneider et al. (2024): Effects of profit-driven cropland expansion and conservation policies. Nature Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01410-x Piipponen et al. (2024): Protein and energy from grazing or crops - does livestock have a chance? Preprint: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3392089/v1
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
