Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Tools of the Qualitative Study

Authors: Mosaddaq Y. Barahmeh, Tahani R. K. Bsharat;

The Tools of the Qualitative Study

Abstract

Abstract: Various techniques and instruments are used in qualitative research to collect and analyze data. This article examines the tools and methods employed for qualitative research, such as getting, interpreting, and judging the data. It provides an inclusive summary of their participatory value in understanding social occurrences. You may get more ideas from the article about field notes, document analysis, focus groups, interviews, and observation. The significance of the article is that it covers essential instruments and elucidates the favorable faces and limitations of these instruments. Mentioned instruments include field notes, document analysis, focus groups, interviews, and observation. It considers the analysis of themes and coding approach of the triangulation method to increase the robustness (dependability and credibility) of qualitative results. The paper demonstrates how critical reflexivity is for those engaged in this kind of research and the extent to which the researchers must be aware of their prejudices regardless of where in the research process they may find themselves. It emphasizes the importance of reflexivity, with researchers required to consider their advocate assumptions and preconceptions at every research stage. This paper explores these tools and methods to offer a glimpse into the nuanced approaches utilized by qualitative researchers to access deep, contextual insights into complex social phenomena. Keywords: Methods Qualitative Research, Interviews, Observation, Focus Groups, Coding, Thematic Analysis, Triangulation Full Text in PDF Abstract GAS PUBLISHERS

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green