Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comparison of tools for automated FAIR software assessment

Authors: Antonioletti, Mario; Wood, Chris; Chue Hong, Neil; Breitmoser, Elena; Moraw, Kara; Verburg, Maaike;

Comparison of tools for automated FAIR software assessment

Abstract

This document summarises work by the FAIR-IMPACT project to examine the application and potential repurposing of three existing automated assessment tools built to assess FAIR data principles, to assess compliance with the FAIR for Research Software (FAIR4RS) principles. At the time this activity was carried out (2023), no automated assessment tools explicitly assessed the FAIR4RS principles, though there are some principles shared by FAIR data and software, in part due to the lack of metrics for FAIR software at the time. The viability of repurposing these tools is based on the similarity between the corresponding FAIR principles applied to data and research software. However, sufficient differences exist that make the direct assessment of FAIR4RS from a FAIR data perspective difficult for some of the principles. In addition, a software assessment tool that uses a different set of recommendations for software based on the FAIR principles was also examined. After the initial explorations presented in this output, FAIR-IMPACT Deliverable 5.2 was created to propose a set of metrics for assessing the FAIR4RS principles. A companion document extends one of the existing FAIR data assessment tools to provide assessments of research software against the FAIR4RS principles. This exploratory activity has now been published as a companion output to this line of work, presenting enriching background context as well as recommendations for tool developers and users towards a further development of FAIR assessment tools.

Keywords

FAIR-IMPACT, FAIR4RS, Research Software, FAIR assessment, FAIR

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
LifeWatch ERIC