Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Image . 2015
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Image . 2015
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Image . 2015
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Figure 3 in Determination of genetic variations between Apodemus mystacinus populations distributed in Turkey inferred from mtDNA PCR-RFLP

Authors: Karacan, Gül Olgun; Çolak, Reyhan; Çolak, Ercüment;

Figure 3 in Determination of genetic variations between Apodemus mystacinus populations distributed in Turkey inferred from mtDNA PCR-RFLP

Abstract

Figure 3. Restriction patterns of HinfI inferred from D-loop digestion (M: Marker–100bp DNA Ladder, 1. Ordu, 2. Trabzon, 3. Rize, 4. Artvin, 5–6. Erzincan, 7–8. Kahramanmaraş, 9. Adıyaman, 10–11. Adana, 12. Muğla, 13. Burdur, 14. Konya, 15. Antalya, 16. Mersin, 17. Kastamonu, 18. Zonguldak, 19. Düzce, 20. Balıkesir, 21. İzmir, 22. Aydın, 23. A. uralensis, 24. A. witherbyi, 25. D-loop PCR products).

Published as part of Karacan, Gül Olgun, Çolak, Reyhan & Çolak, Ercüment, 2015, Determination of genetic variations between Apodemus mystacinus populations distributed in Turkey inferred from mtDNA PCR-RFLP, pp. 630-642 in Turkish Journal of Zoology 39 (6) on page 636, DOI: 10.3906/zoo-1405-75, http://zenodo.org/record/13202226

Keywords

Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average