Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Image . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Image . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Image . 2018
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Fig. 5 in Genome size of chrysophytes varies with cell size and nutritional mode

Authors: Albach Sabina Marks Jens Boenigk Abstract, Jana L. Olefeld Stephan Majda Dirk C.;

Fig. 5 in Genome size of chrysophytes varies with cell size and nutritional mode

Abstract

Fig. 5 Model of evolution of genome size, cell volume, and nutritional mode of chrysophytes: nutrient limitations may have driven genome size reduction in the ancestors of mixotrophic (and heterotrophic) chrysophytes, as well as the evolution of phagotrophic mechanisms to attain additional nutrients. Cell size reduction is supposedly a more gradual process, coming into play in taxa which were already able to obtain nutrients by phagotrophy, which optimized food uptake by the optimization of the predator-prey size ratio. This may have triggered the evolution of obligate heterotrophs in many chrysophyte lineages independently

Published as part of Albach Sabina Marks Jens Boenigk Abstract, Jana L. Olefeld Stephan Majda Dirk C., 2018, Genome size of chrysophytes varies with cell size and nutritional mode, pp. 163-173 in Organisms Diversity & Evolution 18 (2) on page 169, DOI: 10.1007/s13127-018-0365-7, http://zenodo.org/record/13166632

Keywords

Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average