Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Digital spaces of knowledge (dissemination and) visibility: Promotional discourse in European research projects websites Professional and discursive practices within Academia are undergoing a deep process of evolution and change due basically to two phenomena which feed each other: the academics' increasing demands and pressures to gain visibility for their research and the affordances of digital platforms, which guarantee global dissemination of results and, consequently, the strengthening of the required visibility. Although digital genres are increasingly an object of study in linguistics and associated fields, there remain many digital spaces in which basic questions can be explored, such as what constitutes a genre in a virtual space, which communicative purposes these genres have and how they are constructed rhetorically and linguistically. In this presentation I attempt to explore positive markers of evaluation (i.e. evaluative adjectives and adverbs) as main indicators of promotional language in the area of webpages for international research projects. Evaluative markers will be here identified along the lines of Martin and White's (2005) appraisal system, in combination with other approaches to evaluation such as Hunston (2001), Hunston and Thompson (2001) and Biber (2006). For such purposes, 20 webpages by European research projects will be explored, focusing on "showcasing genres" (Luzón 2017) which, under different labels (About, About the project, etc.), aim to justify, promote, and, ultimately, give visibility to the project at stake. The study proposed necessarily involves a rhetorical characterization of the texts as instances of showcasing genres identified in the corpus, focusing on the communicative purposes they fulfill and the relations they maintain with other genres on the webpage. Preliminary results show that a full understanding of the rhetorical and linguistic mechanisms which facilitate the promotional function of these genres is considerably determined by the affordances that these websites provide, allowing the readers to navigate the site and actively construct their own reading path.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts