
The CoreTrustSeal position paper on Curation & Preservation Levels provides the Board, and potential applicants, with a reference point for defining repositories that are in scope for certification. Current CoreTrustSeal Trustworthy Digital Repository (TDR) certification is limited to candidates that take responsibility for active long-term preservation. Active preservation repositories may also intervene in other points in the digital object lifecycle. These intervention points, as defined in the CoreTrustSeal levels of care, include criteria that digital objects must comply with at the point of deposit and after initial curation. All of the levels assume a retention commitment. This discussion paper briefly describes the wider significance of the curation and preservation levels and their alignment with the CoreTrustSeal Requirements. This has implications for the specification of supporting evidence for compliance, including that provided by third party service providers, and potential future assessment and certifications approaches. Comments are welcome on this shared Google document.
Trustworthy, coretrustseal, Repository, repository type
Trustworthy, coretrustseal, Repository, repository type
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
