Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Image . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Image . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Image . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Fig. 2 in Estradiol Treatment during Perinatal Development Alters Adult Partner Preference, Mating Behavior and Estrogen Receptors α and β in the Female Mandarin Vole (Microtus mandarinus)

Authors: He, Feng-Qin; Yu, Bing; Xiang, Quan-Li; Cheng, Xiao-Xia; Wang, Zi-Jian;

Fig. 2 in Estradiol Treatment during Perinatal Development Alters Adult Partner Preference, Mating Behavior and Estrogen Receptors α and β in the Female Mandarin Vole (Microtus mandarinus)

Abstract

Fig. 2. Partner preference data (Behavioral Test 1). In Behavioral Test 1, experimental females were exposed to perinatal treatments and stimulus females or males were anesthetized. 2A) FT females and MC males spent more time with the stimulus anesthetized estrous female than the FC females did. 2B) FT females and MC males spent less time with the stimulus anesthetized intact male than did FC females. 2C) There was no difference in time spent in their own chamber for FC females, FT females, and MC males. 2D) FT females and MC males showed a higher preference score than that of FC females in the partner preference tests. Preference score is calculated as time spent with stimulus female minus the time spent with stimulus male. *: Significantly different from control group, P <0.05; **: Significantly different from control group, P <0.01.

Published as part of He, Feng-Qin, Yu, Bing, Xiang, Quan-Li, Cheng, Xiao-Xia & Wang, Zi-Jian, 2019, Estradiol Treatment during Perinatal Development Alters Adult Partner Preference, Mating Behavior and Estrogen Receptors α and β in the Female Mandarin Vole (Microtus mandarinus), pp. 141-149 in Zoological Studies 58 (41) on page 7, DOI: 10.6620/ZS.2019.58-41, http://zenodo.org/record/12821540

Keywords

Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average