Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Hamaederus fragosoi Botero 2021, new combination

Authors: Botero, Antonio Santos-Silva Kimberly García Juan Pablo;

Hamaederus fragosoi Botero 2021, new combination

Abstract

Hamaederus fragosoi (Martins and Monné, 2002), new combination (Fig. 15–17) Plocaederus fragosoi Martins and Monné 2002: 238; Monné 2005: 56 (cat.); Wappes et al. 2006: 7 (distr.); Martins et al. 2008: 281 (distr.); Touroult et al. 2010: 28; Morvan and Morati 2011: 15 (distr.); Galileo et al. 2011: 10, 78 (distr.); Nascimento and Bravo 2014: 131 (distr.); Monné and Monné 2016: 7 (holotype); Monné 2021: 73 (cat.). Remarks. Hamaederus fragosoi was described based on a single female from Brazil (Amapá). The holotype was destroyed during the fire in 2018 at the MNRJ. Martins et al. (2008) reported the species from French Guiana, and Martins et al. (2014) from the Brazilian state of Ceará. According to Martins and Monné (2002) (translated): “The absence of tubercle in the mesoventral process separates P. fragosoi from P. bipartitus, P. glabricollis, P rugosus, and P. rusticus, species whose mesoventral process is provided with a tubercle. It is more similar to P. glaberrimus and differs in its general color, in the apical spines of non-divergent elytra, and in the upper ocular lobes as far apart as a row of ommatidia. In P. glaberrimus, the elytral spines are markedly divergent and the upper ocular lobes are separated by a distance equal to two rows of ommatidia.” In fact, H. fragosoi is much more similar to H. bipartitus. With the finding that the tubercle of the mesoventral process may be absent in H. bipartitus, as in H. fragosoi (Fig. 17), the only reliable difference between these two species is the shape of the apex of antennomeres III and IV: nodose or subnodose in H. fragosoi (Fig. 16), distinctly projected in H. bipartitus (Fig. 4). This feature does not vary in other species (including those of which we examined a large number of specimens). Material examined. FRENCH GUIANA: Amazone Nature Lodge, Kaw Rd. 6, 4.550330, −52.170310, 1 male, 11–23.VIII.2017, Morris and Wappes leg.(RFMC); Saint Laurent du Maroni, Crique Serpent, 1 female, 10.XI.2006, O. Morvan leg. (MZSP).

Published as part of Botero, Antonio Santos-Silva Kimberly García Juan Pablo, 2021, A review of the history of the names Hamaticherus Dejean and Plocaederus Dejean and description of a new genus and species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae), pp. 1-32 in Insecta Mundi 2021 (887) on page 13, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12808493

Keywords

Coleoptera, Hamaederus fragosoi, Insecta, Arthropoda, Cerambycidae, Animalia, Hamaederus, Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average