
Fig. 10. The effect of SP600125 on the viability of the HD and SCA1 models. The viability was calculated as described in the ''Materials and Methods'' section. The concentrations are presented on the X-axis, and the viability is presented on the Y-axis. Three HD models (A–C) and 3 SCA1 models (D–F) were employed. The genotypes are described within each graph. Each bar represents the mean ¡ SE. The number of vials tested is indicated on the shoulder of each bar. Single and double asterisks indicate significant differences (p,0.05 and 0.01, respectively). The results of the statistical analyses are listed in S6 Table. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116567.g010
Published as part of Shiraishi, Risa, Tamura, Takuya, Sone, Masaki & Okazawa, Hitoshi, 2014, Abstrαct, pp. 1-25 in PLoS ONE (e116567) 9 (12) on page 21, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116567, http://zenodo.org/record/12802403
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
