Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Factors Affecting Readmissions of Term and Late Preterm Infants in the Neonatal Period

Authors: Supriya N; CVS Lakshmi; A Akshay Reddy; Radha Reddy;

Factors Affecting Readmissions of Term and Late Preterm Infants in the Neonatal Period

Abstract

Objective: To determine the incidence of hospital readmissions, the etiologies, and to analyze the risk factors for readmissions of Late Preterm infants (LPI) and term infants (TI) in the neonatal period. Methods: It was a retrospective cohort study conducted at Nice Hospital for Women and Children, Hyderabad, India. The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee. Late preterm and TIs > 34 weeks of gestational age (GA), discharged alive either from the post-natal ward or NICU were included in the study. Neonates with congenital anomalies, who died before discharge, and who were readmitted >28 days of age were excluded from this study. The relevant demographic, antenatal, perinatal and neonatal data of the study infants as well as their mothers were recorded in the pre-designed proforma. Mann Whitney U test and Chi square tests were used for statistical analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 1396 (100%) neonates were included in this study. Thirty-eight (2.72%) of the LPIs were readmitted and 3.87% (54) were in the TI category. When neonatal characteristics were compared, statistically significant difference was seen in both categories in birth weight, jaundice requiring phototherapy, sepsis and time to full feeding respectively. Poor weight gain was the leading cause of readmission in both categories; though not statistically significant. Maximum LPIs (23) and TIs (36) were admitted in the monsoon; though statistically no significant difference was observed. Conclusion: Poor weight gain, respiratory infection, jaundice, poor feeding/lethargy and feeding difficulty/vomiting were identified as reasons for readmission. Metacentric studies with a large sample size are recommended.

Objective: To determine the incidence of hospital readmissions, the etiologies, and to analyze the risk factors for readmissions of Late Preterm infants (LPI) and term infants (TI) in the neonatal period. Methods: It was a retrospective cohort study conducted at Nice Hospital for Women and Children, Hyderabad, India. The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee. Late preterm and TIs > 34 weeks of gestational age (GA), discharged alive either from the post-natal ward or NICU were included in the study. Neonates with congenital anomalies, who died before discharge, and who were readmitted >28 days of age were excluded from this study. The relevant demographic, antenatal, perinatal and neonatal data of the study infants as well as their mothers were recorded in the pre-designed proforma. Mann Whitney U test and Chi square tests were used for statistical analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 1396 (100%) neonates were included in this study. Thirty-eight (2.72%) of the LPIs were readmitted and 3.87% (54) were in the TI category. When neonatal characteristics were compared, statistically significant difference was seen in both categories in birth weight, jaundice requiring phototherapy, sepsis and time to full feeding respectively. Poor weight gain was the leading cause of readmission in both categories; though not statistically significant. Maximum LPIs (23) and TIs (36) were admitted in the monsoon; though statistically no significant difference was observed. Conclusion: Poor weight gain, respiratory infection, jaundice, poor feeding/lethargy and feeding difficulty/vomiting were identified as reasons for readmission. Metacentric studies with a large sample size are recommended.

Keywords

Readmission, Term, Preterm, Infant

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities