Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Evaluation of Phenotypic and Genotypic Test Methods to Detect Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus

Authors: Nazia Anwar; Gautam Sanjay Kumar; Tarannum Yasmin; R. S. Prasad;

Evaluation of Phenotypic and Genotypic Test Methods to Detect Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus

Abstract

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a prevalent cause of nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Because of this, accurate MRSA detection is essential for both implementing control measures and lowering MRSA endemicity. The current study set out to evaluate the performance of various phenotypic methods with mecA-based PCR for MRSA detection. Methods: This investigation includes a total of 2000 S. aureus isolates. Oxacillin disc diffusion, oxacillin MIC, cefoxitin disc diffusion, and the oxacillin screen agar test were used to assess methicillin resistance, and they were compared to mecA-based PCR. Results: According to Cefoxitin and Oxacillin susceptibility tests, 530 (26.50%) and 302 (30.1%) of the 2000 isolates from our hospital were determined to be MRSA. The Cefoxitin disc diffusion test for MRSA identification has a better correlation with the gold standard PCR approach than any other phenotypic method. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that the cefoxitin disc diffusion method has a high sensitivity and specificity when compared to other phenotypic methodologies for MRSA detection. As an alternative to PCR for the detection of MRSA, cefoxitin disc diffusion test results for MRSA prevalence are compatible with PCR results for the mecA gene.

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a prevalent cause of nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Because of this, accurate MRSA detection is essential for both implementing control measures and lowering MRSA endemicity. The current study set out to evaluate the performance of various phenotypic methods with mecA-based PCR for MRSA detection. Methods: This investigation includes a total of 2000 S. aureus isolates. Oxacillin disc diffusion, oxacillin MIC, cefoxitin disc diffusion, and the oxacillin screen agar test were used to assess methicillin resistance, and they were compared to mecA-based PCR. Results: According to Cefoxitin and Oxacillin susceptibility tests, 530 (26.50%) and 302 (30.1%) of the 2000 isolates from our hospital were determined to be MRSA. The Cefoxitin disc diffusion test for MRSA identification has a better correlation with the gold standard PCR approach than any other phenotypic method. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that the cefoxitin disc diffusion method has a high sensitivity and specificity when compared to other phenotypic methodologies for MRSA detection. As an alternative to PCR for the detection of MRSA, cefoxitin disc diffusion test results for MRSA prevalence are compatible with PCR results for the mecA gene.

Keywords

MRSA, mecA, Cefoxitin, Oxacillin MIC, PCR

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green