Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Study to Evaluate the Various Factors Contributing to Failure of Medical Management in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Authors: Kumari Jyoti Mani; Mobashir Jamal; Amit Kumar; Satyendra Sharma;

A Study to Evaluate the Various Factors Contributing to Failure of Medical Management in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Abstract

AbstractAim: The aim of the present study was to identify various factors contributing to failure of medical managementin patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.Methods: This was a Prospective observational study with sample size of 50 conducted in the Department ofENT, Nalanda medical college and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India. Patients above the age of 15 years and below theage of 65years, with regular follow up and not on any steroids for last one month were included in to this study.Results: Diagnostic Nasal endoscopy revealed that DNS was the most common finding in both groups withhighest incidence in group B, followed by Mucin and Middle turbinate hypertrophy. Among these, Deviated nasalseptum and Mucin were high in non-responders comparatively and is significant statistically. Non ContrastComputed tomography of nose and paranasal sinuses showed statistically significant result (p<0.05).In our study,Fungus was seen more in group B but was statistically insignificant. Immunocompromised status was more ingroup B which was statistically significant (p <0.05).Conclusion: The study emphasized that presence of Deviated nasal septum, Mucin, Aspergillus niger andcompromissed immune status contributed for failure of medical management in chronic rhinosinusitis

AbstractAim: The aim of the present study was to identify various factors contributing to failure of medical managementin patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.Methods: This was a Prospective observational study with sample size of 50 conducted in the Department ofENT, Nalanda medical college and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India. Patients above the age of 15 years and below theage of 65years, with regular follow up and not on any steroids for last one month were included in to this study.Results: Diagnostic Nasal endoscopy revealed that DNS was the most common finding in both groups withhighest incidence in group B, followed by Mucin and Middle turbinate hypertrophy. Among these, Deviated nasalseptum and Mucin were high in non-responders comparatively and is significant statistically. Non ContrastComputed tomography of nose and paranasal sinuses showed statistically significant result (p<0.05).In our study,Fungus was seen more in group B but was statistically insignificant. Immunocompromised status was more ingroup B which was statistically significant (p <0.05).Conclusion: The study emphasized that presence of Deviated nasal septum, Mucin, Aspergillus niger andcompromissed immune status contributed for failure of medical management in chronic rhinosinusitis

Related Organizations
Keywords

Chronic rhinosinusitis, Deviated nasal septum(DNS) , Osteomatal complex , Mucin ,Fungi , Immune status

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities