Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Prospective Research on Vaginal Candidiasis among the Adults

Authors: Sireesha Chava; Gayatri Koyya; Thotlapalepu Sahiti Royal; Kunam Nikitha;

A Prospective Research on Vaginal Candidiasis among the Adults

Abstract

Introduction: Recent research highlights the global challenge of Candida infections among adults, necessitating comprehensive understanding. Investigating prevalence and risk factors of vaginal candidiasis (VC) in pregnancy versus non-pregnancy aims to contribute insights into this common fungal infection’s epidemiology and its implications for maternal health. Methods: It was a prospective research conducted in GSL Medical College. Pregnant women aged > 18 years were considered in the test and non pregnant women in control group. Collection of vaginal swab, microscopic examination, culture were practised as per the guidelines. For analysis, Chi square test was used, P<0.005 was considered to be significant. Results: In this study 174 participants, evenly divided into test and control groups, the mean ages were similar. VC incidence was 31.6%, with 19.5% in the test and 12% in the control group, showing no significant difference. Candida albicans predominated, with a 10:1 ratio of non-albicans species. Conclusion: This study found a comparable incidence of VC between pregnant and non-pregnant groups, suggesting pregnancy status may not significantly influence VC risk. Candida albicans predominated among isolated species. Further research is warranted to elucidate VC’s multifactorial etiology and optimize preventive strategies.

Introduction: Recent research highlights the global challenge of Candida infections among adults, necessitating comprehensive understanding. Investigating prevalence and risk factors of vaginal candidiasis (VC) in pregnancy versus non-pregnancy aims to contribute insights into this common fungal infection’s epidemiology and its implications for maternal health. Methods: It was a prospective research conducted in GSL Medical College. Pregnant women aged > 18 years were considered in the test and non pregnant women in control group. Collection of vaginal swab, microscopic examination, culture were practised as per the guidelines. For analysis, Chi square test was used, P<0.005 was considered to be significant. Results: In this study 174 participants, evenly divided into test and control groups, the mean ages were similar. VC incidence was 31.6%, with 19.5% in the test and 12% in the control group, showing no significant difference. Candida albicans predominated, with a 10:1 ratio of non-albicans species. Conclusion: This study found a comparable incidence of VC between pregnant and non-pregnant groups, suggesting pregnancy status may not significantly influence VC risk. Candida albicans predominated among isolated species. Further research is warranted to elucidate VC’s multifactorial etiology and optimize preventive strategies.

Keywords

Vaginal candidiasis, Incidence, Candida albicans, Non-albicans, Epidemiology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities