Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Comparaitive Study between 25 Mcg Dexmedetomidine and 25 Mcg Clonidine as Adjuvant with 0.5% Levobupivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Upper Limb Surgeries

Authors: Kunda Mary Uma Manjula; Dasupuram Gunapriya; Yedida Veera Pratap Kumar; Shaik Jareena Begum;

A Comparaitive Study between 25 Mcg Dexmedetomidine and 25 Mcg Clonidine as Adjuvant with 0.5% Levobupivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Upper Limb Surgeries

Abstract

Introduction: This study compares the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as adjuvants to levobupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries. Dexmedetomidine’s higher selectivity for α2-adrenergic receptors potentially enhances its analgesic effects compared to clonidine. Methods: A prospective study conducted at Rangaraya Medical College, Kakinada, evaluated ASA grade I and II patients, aged 18-50, undergoing upper limb surgeries. groups C and D received clonidine and dexmedetomidine, respectively, with levobupivacaine in supraclavicular blocks. Sensory and motor block characteristics were assessed post-operatively for 24 hours. Results: Group D exhibited faster onset of sensory and motor blocks (4.86 ± 0.91 mins and 7.08 ± 1.006 mins) compared to group C (7.2 ± 1.1 mins and 9.94 ± 1.67 mins). Motor block duration was longer in group D (12.7 ± 0.7 hrs) than group C (10.8 ± 0.6 hrs). Rescue analgesic requirement and sedation scores significantly varied between groups. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in brachial plexus block demonstrated faster onset of sensory and motor blocks, prolonged motor block duration, and reduced rescue analgesic requirement compared to clonidine. These findings suggest dexmedetomidine’s potential superiority in enhancing regional anesthesia outcomes for upper limb surgeries.

Introduction: This study compares the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as adjuvants to levobupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries. Dexmedetomidine’s higher selectivity for α2-adrenergic receptors potentially enhances its analgesic effects compared to clonidine. Methods: A prospective study conducted at Rangaraya Medical College, Kakinada, evaluated ASA grade I and II patients, aged 18-50, undergoing upper limb surgeries. groups C and D received clonidine and dexmedetomidine, respectively, with levobupivacaine in supraclavicular blocks. Sensory and motor block characteristics were assessed post-operatively for 24 hours. Results: Group D exhibited faster onset of sensory and motor blocks (4.86 ± 0.91 mins and 7.08 ± 1.006 mins) compared to group C (7.2 ± 1.1 mins and 9.94 ± 1.67 mins). Motor block duration was longer in group D (12.7 ± 0.7 hrs) than group C (10.8 ± 0.6 hrs). Rescue analgesic requirement and sedation scores significantly varied between groups. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in brachial plexus block demonstrated faster onset of sensory and motor blocks, prolonged motor block duration, and reduced rescue analgesic requirement compared to clonidine. These findings suggest dexmedetomidine’s potential superiority in enhancing regional anesthesia outcomes for upper limb surgeries.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Dexmedetomidine, Clonidine, Brachial Plexus Block, Sensory Block, Motor Block.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities