Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Image . 2015
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Image . 2015
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Image . 2015
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Fig. 1 in Development and reproduction of Mallada basalis (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on artificial diets

Authors: Ye, Jingwen; Dai, Jianqing; Li, Jun; Li, Zhigang; Lu, Yongyue; Han, Shichou; Zeng, Ling;

Fig. 1 in Development and reproduction of Mallada basalis (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on artificial diets

Abstract

Fig. 1. Developmental parameters of Mallada basalis fed during the immature stages of the F1 generation on the 3 artificial diets at 26 ± 1 °C. F1 egg hatch and pupation rates differed significantly among the 3 diet treatments and both parameters were significantly the greatest in the AD1 treatment and unacceptably small in the AD2 treatment. F1 adult emergence rates among the 3 diets did not differ significantly (P> 0.05). The F1 generation produced no eggs in the AD2 treatment. The hatch rate from F2 eggs in the AD1 treatment was significantly greater than in the AD3 treatment.

Published as part of Ye, Jingwen, Dai, Jianqing, Li, Jun, Li, Zhigang, Lu, Yongyue, Han, Shichou & Zeng, Ling, 2015, Florida Entomologist 98 (4) on page 1072, DOI: 10.1653/024.098.0410, http://zenodo.org/record/12768594

Related Organizations
Keywords

Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average