Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

NIBIO_MLS: a forest point cloud panoptic segmentation dataset from mobile laser scanning (Geoslam Horizon)

Authors: Puliti, Stefano; Astrup, Rasmus;

NIBIO_MLS: a forest point cloud panoptic segmentation dataset from mobile laser scanning (Geoslam Horizon)

Abstract

General description This dataset consists of a ML-ready labelled mobile laser scanning (MLS) point cloud dataset including 16 manually labelled forest plots (approx. 250 m2) for forest panoptic segmentation and thus including both semantic and instance labels. The data was collected using a Geoslam Horizon RT and processed using Geoslam Hub. Labels The data were then labelled into the following semantic classes (label): 1= ground 2= vegetation: these include both branches, leaves, and low vegetation 3= lying deadwood 4= stems In addition for each tree, a unique tree identifier (treeID) was also assigned to each point. Data split Each plot was split into train (50%), validation (25%), and test (25%) sets by dividing the circular plot into four slices, out of which the first two were used for training, the third for validation, and the fourth for test. Thus the users might play around with merging the train and validation dataset as they prefer. These two sets can be used during model training, hyperparameter tuning, and model selection. However, the test set should be kept as an independent set to be used for benchmarking against the values reported in the two studies indicated below. Citation To cite this datasets and for a more detailed description use: Wielgosz, M., Puliti, S., Xiang, B., Schindler, K. and Astrup, R., 2024. SegmentAnyTree: A sensor and platform agnostic deep learning model for tree segmentation using laser scanning data. Remote Sensing of Environment; Other studies using these data Wielgosz, M., Puliti, S., Wilkes, P. and Astrup, R., 2023. Point2Tree (P2T)—Framework for parameter tuning of semantic and instance segmentation used with mobile laser scanning data in coniferous forest. Remote Sensing, 15(15), p.3737; available here Funding This work is part of the Center for Research-based Innovation SmartForest: Bringing Industry 4.0 tothe Norwegian forest sector (NFR SFI project no. 309671, smartforest.no).

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average