Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Comparative Analysis of the Impact of 1% Xylocaine Spray on Fallopian Tubes Prior to Tubal Ligation via Minilaparotomy or Laparoscopic Sterilization

Authors: Madhavi; Alok Kumar Singh;

A Comparative Analysis of the Impact of 1% Xylocaine Spray on Fallopian Tubes Prior to Tubal Ligation via Minilaparotomy or Laparoscopic Sterilization

Abstract

Background: The study aims to compare the impact of 1% Xylocaine spray on fallopian tubes prior to tubal ligation via minilaparotomy or laparoscopic sterilization, exploring its role in alleviating postoperative pain and enhancing patient satisfaction in gynecological surgery. Methods: The prospective comparative study involved 100 women undergoing tubal ligation, randomly assigned to either minilaparotomy (Group 1) or laparoscopic sterilization (Group 2). In Group 1, Xylocaine spray was applied to the fallopian tubes prior to tubal ligation, while no Xylocaine spray was used in Group 2. Data was analyzed using appropriate statistical methods. Results: Baseline characteristics between the two groups were similar, with no significant differences in age, BMI, parity, or past medical history. Postoperative outcomes revealed that mean pain scores at 6 and 24 hours were significantly lower in Group 1 compared to Group 2. The incidence of fallopian tube spasm was lower in Group 1, although not statistically significant. However, the mean duration of surgery was longer in Group 2. Patient satisfaction scores were higher in Group 1. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the use of Xylocaine spray was associated with lower pain scores and higher patient satisfaction. Conclusion: The study suggests that the application of 1% Xylocaine spray on fallopian tubes prior to tubal ligation via minilaparotomy is associated with lower postoperative pain scores and higher patient satisfaction compared to laparoscopic sterilization without Xylocaine spray. While laparoscopic sterilization may result in longer surgical duration, there were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two approaches. Recommendations: Based on these findings, the use of Xylocaine spray should be considered as part of pain management strategies during tubal ligation procedures, particularly for patients undergoing minilaparotomy. Further research could explore the long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of this approach.

Background: The study aims to compare the impact of 1% Xylocaine spray on fallopian tubes prior to tubal ligation via minilaparotomy or laparoscopic sterilization, exploring its role in alleviating postoperative pain and enhancing patient satisfaction in gynecological surgery. Methods: The prospective comparative study involved 100 women undergoing tubal ligation, randomly assigned to either minilaparotomy (Group 1) or laparoscopic sterilization (Group 2). In Group 1, Xylocaine spray was applied to the fallopian tubes prior to tubal ligation, while no Xylocaine spray was used in Group 2. Data was analyzed using appropriate statistical methods. Results: Baseline characteristics between the two groups were similar, with no significant differences in age, BMI, parity, or past medical history. Postoperative outcomes revealed that mean pain scores at 6 and 24 hours were significantly lower in Group 1 compared to Group 2. The incidence of fallopian tube spasm was lower in Group 1, although not statistically significant. However, the mean duration of surgery was longer in Group 2. Patient satisfaction scores were higher in Group 1. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the use of Xylocaine spray was associated with lower pain scores and higher patient satisfaction. Conclusion: The study suggests that the application of 1% Xylocaine spray on fallopian tubes prior to tubal ligation via minilaparotomy is associated with lower postoperative pain scores and higher patient satisfaction compared to laparoscopic sterilization without Xylocaine spray. While laparoscopic sterilization may result in longer surgical duration, there were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two approaches. Recommendations: Based on these findings, the use of Xylocaine spray should be considered as part of pain management strategies during tubal ligation procedures, particularly for patients undergoing minilaparotomy. Further research could explore the long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of this approach.

Keywords

Tubal Ligation, Minilaparotomy, Laparoscopic Sterilization, Xylocaine Spray, Postoperative Pain

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities