Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Comparative Study to Evaluate Hemodynamic Effects of Regional Anaesthesia in Preeclamptic Females Undergoing Caesarean Section

Authors: Neeraj Kumar; P. K. Sinhha;

A Comparative Study to Evaluate Hemodynamic Effects of Regional Anaesthesia in Preeclamptic Females Undergoing Caesarean Section

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate hemodynamic effects of regional anaesthesia in preeclampticfemales.Methods: The observational study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesia, Anugrah Narayan MagadhMedical College and Hospital, Gaya , Bihar, India from march 2019 to February 2020. Study populationcomprised of 100 normotensive ASA grade II parturients planned for LSCS and 100 ASA grade III preeclampticparturients planned for LSCS.Results: Mean age in normotensive group was 25.35±4.36 years and in pre- eclamptic group mean age was24.16±3.07 years. The mean weight at the time of caesarean section was 72.8±6.34 kgs in the preeclamptic groupand 74.66±7.53 kgs in preeclamptic. The mean gestational age at the time of caesarean section was 39.14±0.54weeks in preeclamptic women and 39.07±0.77 weeks in normotensive. Majority of the study participants werenulliparous women in both the group (55% in normotensive group v/s 68% in pre- eclamptic group) while nearly43% of the participants in the normotensive group and 27% in pre-eclamptic group were primipara. Both groupswere comparable in term of mean age, weight, gestational age and parity comparison (p<0.05). All the nonpreeclamptic parturients were ASA II while, all parturients in the preeclamptic group were ASA III, and thisdifference was statistically significant between both groups; (p< 0.001). The incidence of hypotension in nonpreeclamptic parturients (93%) was significantly higher and that of preeclamptic parturients (15%). Similarly,bradycardia was also more commonly observed in normotensive group (32%) compared to pre-eclamptic group(2%).Conclusion: Subarachnoid blockade is associated with better perioperative hemodynamic stability and lower riskof hypotension and vasopressor requirements in preeclamptic women compared to the rates of healthy subjects.Subarachnoid block can be safely practiced in patients with preeclampsia undergoing caesarean section. Thebenefit of rapid, dense and reliable subarachnoid block over epidural anaesthesia should be considered forpreeclamptics undergoing caesarean section

Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate hemodynamic effects of regional anaesthesia in preeclampticfemales.Methods: The observational study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesia, Anugrah Narayan MagadhMedical College and Hospital, Gaya , Bihar, India from march 2019 to February 2020. Study populationcomprised of 100 normotensive ASA grade II parturients planned for LSCS and 100 ASA grade III preeclampticparturients planned for LSCS.Results: Mean age in normotensive group was 25.35±4.36 years and in pre- eclamptic group mean age was24.16±3.07 years. The mean weight at the time of caesarean section was 72.8±6.34 kgs in the preeclamptic groupand 74.66±7.53 kgs in preeclamptic. The mean gestational age at the time of caesarean section was 39.14±0.54weeks in preeclamptic women and 39.07±0.77 weeks in normotensive. Majority of the study participants werenulliparous women in both the group (55% in normotensive group v/s 68% in pre- eclamptic group) while nearly43% of the participants in the normotensive group and 27% in pre-eclamptic group were primipara. Both groupswere comparable in term of mean age, weight, gestational age and parity comparison (p<0.05). All the nonpreeclamptic parturients were ASA II while, all parturients in the preeclamptic group were ASA III, and thisdifference was statistically significant between both groups; (p< 0.001). The incidence of hypotension in nonpreeclamptic parturients (93%) was significantly higher and that of preeclamptic parturients (15%). Similarly,bradycardia was also more commonly observed in normotensive group (32%) compared to pre-eclamptic group(2%).Conclusion: Subarachnoid blockade is associated with better perioperative hemodynamic stability and lower riskof hypotension and vasopressor requirements in preeclamptic women compared to the rates of healthy subjects.Subarachnoid block can be safely practiced in patients with preeclampsia undergoing caesarean section. Thebenefit of rapid, dense and reliable subarachnoid block over epidural anaesthesia should be considered forpreeclamptics undergoing caesarean section

Keywords

Subarachnoid blockade, preeclampsia, caesarean section, hemodynamic stability

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average