Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Assessment of Different Techniques of Nucleotomy during Phacoemulsification: A Comparative Study

Authors: Gautam Kumar; Ajay Kumar Sinha; Umesh Prasad Bhadani;

Assessment of Different Techniques of Nucleotomy during Phacoemulsification: A Comparative Study

Abstract

Abstract Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare different techniques of nucleotomy during phacoemulsification with respect to corneal endothelial cell loss, central corneal thickness (CCT). Methods: A comparative analysis on corneal endothelial cell loss and central corneal thickness was done in 90 patients undergoing cataract extraction by phacoemulsification in Department of Ophthalmology .These 90 patients were randomly divided into three groups of 30 each who underwent a different method of nucleotomy during phacoemulsification and were operated by the same surgeon. Results: The maximum number of patients was in Group A, 17 patients were in the age group of 61-70 years while most of the patients, 18 in Group B and 21 in Group C, were in the age group of 51 – 60 years. The mean age of patients in Groups A, B and C were 60.65 years, 61.25 years and 59.45 years respectively. There were more females and most of the patients belonged to NS grade I. The maximum number of patients in each group: 11 patients in Group A had visual acuity of 6/36 preoperatively, 14 patients in Group B and 16 patients in Group C had visual acuity of 6/60 preoperatively. No statistically significant difference was found in mean endothelial cell density in Group A, B and C preoperatively. No statistically significant difference was found in mean central corneal thickness in Group A, B and C preoperatively, and at 1st, 4th and 12th postoperative week. It was observed that CCT after 4 weeks of cataract surgery was not much different from preoperative value in all three groups. No patient of any group had BCVA of less than 6/36 on Snellen’s distance visual acuity chart with spectacles correction. Conclusion: All three techniques of nucleotomy in phacoemulsification i.e divide & conquer, stop and chop and direct phaco chop are equally efficacious. The degree of endothelial cell loss and central corneal thickness changes in all three methods are almost similar in the hands of an experienced surgeon. 

Abstract Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare different techniques of nucleotomy during phacoemulsification with respect to corneal endothelial cell loss, central corneal thickness (CCT). Methods: A comparative analysis on corneal endothelial cell loss and central corneal thickness was done in 90 patients undergoing cataract extraction by phacoemulsification in Department of Ophthalmology .These 90 patients were randomly divided into three groups of 30 each who underwent a different method of nucleotomy during phacoemulsification and were operated by the same surgeon. Results: The maximum number of patients was in Group A, 17 patients were in the age group of 61-70 years while most of the patients, 18 in Group B and 21 in Group C, were in the age group of 51 – 60 years. The mean age of patients in Groups A, B and C were 60.65 years, 61.25 years and 59.45 years respectively. There were more females and most of the patients belonged to NS grade I. The maximum number of patients in each group: 11 patients in Group A had visual acuity of 6/36 preoperatively, 14 patients in Group B and 16 patients in Group C had visual acuity of 6/60 preoperatively. No statistically significant difference was found in mean endothelial cell density in Group A, B and C preoperatively. No statistically significant difference was found in mean central corneal thickness in Group A, B and C preoperatively, and at 1st, 4th and 12th postoperative week. It was observed that CCT after 4 weeks of cataract surgery was not much different from preoperative value in all three groups. No patient of any group had BCVA of less than 6/36 on Snellen’s distance visual acuity chart with spectacles correction. Conclusion: All three techniques of nucleotomy in phacoemulsification i.e divide & conquer, stop and chop and direct phaco chop are equally efficacious. The degree of endothelial cell loss and central corneal thickness changes in all three methods are almost similar in the hands of an experienced surgeon. 

Related Organizations
Keywords

Endothelial cell loss, Nucleotomy, Phacoemulsification

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities