
This study bridges gaps in air pollution research by examining exposure dynamics in disadvantaged communities. Using cutting-edge machine learning and massive data processing, we produced high-resolution (100 m) daily air pollution maps for nitrogen dioxide (NO2), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and ozone (O3) across California from 2012 to 2019. Our findings revealed opposite spatial patterns of NO2 and PM2.5 to that of O3. We also identified consistent, higher pollutant exposure for disadvantaged communities from 2012 to 2019 though the most disadvantaged communities saw the largest NO2 and PM2.5 reductions and the advantaged neighborhoods experienced the greatest rising O3 concentrations. Further, day-to-day exposure variations decreased for NO2 and O3. The disparity in NO2 exposure decreased, while it persisted for O3. Additionally, PM2.5 showed increased day-to-day variations across all communities, due to the increase in wildfire frequency and intensity, particularly affecting advantaged suburban and rural communities.
This dataset was collected and processed as detailed in our Science Advances paper: Jason G. Su, Vy Vuong, Eahsan Shahriary, Emma Yakutis, Emma Sage, Rebecca Haile, John Balmes, Michael Jerrett, Meredith Barrett. "Examining Air Pollution Exposure Dynamics in Disadvantaged Communities through High-Resolution Mapping." Science Advances, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adm9986.
Funding provided by: California Air Resources BoardROR ID: https://ror.org/021h56y19Award Number: 19RD004
Land Use Regression, particulate matter, Ozone, nitrogen dioxide, Air pollution, O3, PM2.5, Deletion/Substitution/Addition, Remote sensing, NO2, GIS, Google Earth Engine, Small Area Variation
Land Use Regression, particulate matter, Ozone, nitrogen dioxide, Air pollution, O3, PM2.5, Deletion/Substitution/Addition, Remote sensing, NO2, GIS, Google Earth Engine, Small Area Variation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
