
In 2004 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as part of the Process Analytical Technology Guidance,introduced the idea of Quality by Design (QbD). The core objective was to design quality into the process andproduct rather than try to check quality of the product at the end of production. It has been known since long timethat “quality by testing” is a low-yield and costly strategy. ICH, in 2005, outlined the concept of design space in itsQ8 guideline related to development of pharmaceuticals. Since that time, pharmaceutical companies, despitedepending on innovation for their livelihood, have been adopting QbD for new drug applications (NDA) and aswell as for Abbreviated New Drug applications (ANDA). In nutshell it has been observed that, now QbD isbecoming mainstay of development of pharmaceutical products.
In 2004 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as part of the Process Analytical Technology Guidance,introduced the idea of Quality by Design (QbD). The core objective was to design quality into the process andproduct rather than try to check quality of the product at the end of production. It has been known since long timethat “quality by testing” is a low-yield and costly strategy. ICH, in 2005, outlined the concept of design space in itsQ8 guideline related to development of pharmaceuticals. Since that time, pharmaceutical companies, despitedepending on innovation for their livelihood, have been adopting QbD for new drug applications (NDA) and aswell as for Abbreviated New Drug applications (ANDA). In nutshell it has been observed that, now QbD isbecoming mainstay of development of pharmaceutical products.
Quality, pharmaceuticals, FDA, ICH, industry
Quality, pharmaceuticals, FDA, ICH, industry
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
