Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Glimepiride with Sitagliptin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Authors: Navin Kumar; Navin Kishore; Shashi Prakash Chandra; Asha Singh;

A Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Glimepiride with Sitagliptin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Abstract

Background: One of the key reasons why treating people with diabetes mellitus (DM) and society at large is expensive. To contrast sitagliptin safety and efficiency with glimepiride in Type 2 DM patients who are also being treated with metformin as a background. Methods: From December 2021 to November 2022, this study was carried out at NMCH, Patna, Bihar. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive sitagliptin 100 mg and glimepiride 2 mg once daily as an add-on medication for 12 weeks. A pre-populated proforma was filled up with demographic data. All study participants/patients heard advice to keep up a healthy diet and exercise frequently. At week 0 and again at week 12, which is when the trial came to an end, all patients’ HbA1C, FBS, weight, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), serum urea, and serum creatinine measurements were obtained. The primary goal was to reach the target HbA1C upper normal level at the end of the study. Results: A total of 120 patients were enrolled in the experiment, with 60 in each group. There were 36 men and 24 women in group B, compared to 32 men and 28 women in group A. Group A utilising sitagliptin demonstrated a statistically significant decline in HbA1C and BMI when compared to the Glimepiride group. (p0.05). Hypoglycemia, diarrhoea, and vomiting were the most frequent adverse reactions in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of occurrence between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: The results of the current research show that sitagliptin, when taken in addition to metformin, improves glycemic control just as effectively as glimepiride and is well tolerated with no obvious side effects. Glimepiride fared worse than sitagliptin, which also had a decreased risk of hypoglycemia. In addition, it was well tolerated and caused weight loss when compared to glimepiride.

Background: One of the key reasons why treating people with diabetes mellitus (DM) and society at large is expensive. To contrast sitagliptin safety and efficiency with glimepiride in Type 2 DM patients who are also being treated with metformin as a background. Methods: From December 2021 to November 2022, this study was carried out at NMCH, Patna, Bihar. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive sitagliptin 100 mg and glimepiride 2 mg once daily as an add-on medication for 12 weeks. A pre-populated proforma was filled up with demographic data. All study participants/patients heard advice to keep up a healthy diet and exercise frequently. At week 0 and again at week 12, which is when the trial came to an end, all patients’ HbA1C, FBS, weight, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), serum urea, and serum creatinine measurements were obtained. The primary goal was to reach the target HbA1C upper normal level at the end of the study. Results: A total of 120 patients were enrolled in the experiment, with 60 in each group. There were 36 men and 24 women in group B, compared to 32 men and 28 women in group A. Group A utilising sitagliptin demonstrated a statistically significant decline in HbA1C and BMI when compared to the Glimepiride group. (p0.05). Hypoglycemia, diarrhoea, and vomiting were the most frequent adverse reactions in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of occurrence between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: The results of the current research show that sitagliptin, when taken in addition to metformin, improves glycemic control just as effectively as glimepiride and is well tolerated with no obvious side effects. Glimepiride fared worse than sitagliptin, which also had a decreased risk of hypoglycemia. In addition, it was well tolerated and caused weight loss when compared to glimepiride.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Diabetes Mellitus, Sitagliptin, Glimepiride, HbA1C, BMI

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities