Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

DISTRIBUTION OF LEPRA REACTIONS AND ITS CLINICOHISTOPATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION: A CENTRAL INDIA STUDY

Authors: Sanjay Pancholi;

DISTRIBUTION OF LEPRA REACTIONS AND ITS CLINICOHISTOPATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION: A CENTRAL INDIA STUDY

Abstract

Introduction: Leprosy is one of the most ancient diseases known to mankind. It is a chronic,debilitating, granulomatous disease caused by Mycobacterium Leprae principally affectingthe cooler parts of the body, mainly skin and peripheral nerves. Leprosy reactions areimmunologically mediated episodes of acute or subacute inflammation which interrupt thenatural course of disease affecting the skin, nerves and others tissues. Reactional states aredivided into two forms, called type I and type II reactions. Material and Methods: Presentstudy was carried out in patients attending the Outpatient and Inpatient, Department ofdepartment of DVL Index Medical College, Indore from January 2015 to December 2018.Gross examinations of biopsies were done and Histopathological features and thebacteriological status were noted and the diagnosis of leprosy was confirmed and classifiedaccording to Ridley and Jopling classification. Results: Out of total 50 patients, 19 patientswere of Type I reaction while 31 of Type II reaction. Among 19 type I reaction patients, 14were of Borderline Tuberculoid, 03 of Mid Borderline while 2 were of BorderlineLepromatous, thus BT patients had higher incidence of type I reaction. Among 31 type IIpatients 20 were of lepromatous leprosy while rest 11 of borderline lepromatous.Conclusion: In the present study prevalence of type II Lepra reaction was higher than type ILepra reaction. This study emphasizes the need for detailed history, clinical examination andinvestigations including biopsy for timely recognition of reactions, in order to halt theprogress and prevent the permanent damage it causes.

Introduction: Leprosy is one of the most ancient diseases known to mankind. It is a chronic,debilitating, granulomatous disease caused by Mycobacterium Leprae principally affectingthe cooler parts of the body, mainly skin and peripheral nerves. Leprosy reactions areimmunologically mediated episodes of acute or subacute inflammation which interrupt thenatural course of disease affecting the skin, nerves and others tissues. Reactional states aredivided into two forms, called type I and type II reactions. Material and Methods: Presentstudy was carried out in patients attending the Outpatient and Inpatient, Department ofdepartment of DVL Index Medical College, Indore from January 2015 to December 2018.Gross examinations of biopsies were done and Histopathological features and thebacteriological status were noted and the diagnosis of leprosy was confirmed and classifiedaccording to Ridley and Jopling classification. Results: Out of total 50 patients, 19 patientswere of Type I reaction while 31 of Type II reaction. Among 19 type I reaction patients, 14were of Borderline Tuberculoid, 03 of Mid Borderline while 2 were of BorderlineLepromatous, thus BT patients had higher incidence of type I reaction. Among 31 type IIpatients 20 were of lepromatous leprosy while rest 11 of borderline lepromatous.Conclusion: In the present study prevalence of type II Lepra reaction was higher than type ILepra reaction. This study emphasizes the need for detailed history, clinical examination andinvestigations including biopsy for timely recognition of reactions, in order to halt theprogress and prevent the permanent damage it causes.

Keywords

Lepra Reaction, Tuberculoid leprosy, Lepromatous leprosy etc.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green