Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

To Evaluate the Stricture of Posterior Urethra before & after 'U' Shape Urethroplasty by Uroflowmetry, RCU/MCU, Patient Satisfaction and Urethroscopy

Authors: Ishant Chaurasia; Sourabh Mishra; Ajay Sharma; D. Paramhans;

To Evaluate the Stricture of Posterior Urethra before & after 'U' Shape Urethroplasty by Uroflowmetry, RCU/MCU, Patient Satisfaction and Urethroscopy

Abstract

Background & Method: The aim of present study is to evaluate the stricture of posterior urethra before& after ‘U’ shape urethroplasty by uroflowmetry, RCU/MCU, patient satisfaction and Urethroscopy. The detailed history and physical examination will be carried out. Dye studies will be done both pre and postoperatively. Then patient satisfaction will be noted both objectively and subjectively and patient will be counselled for urethroscopic examination postoperatively. Result: The youngest patient was 10 years old and the oldest was 68 years. From the above table it is seen that maximum no. of cases (33.6 %) belong to 21-30 years age groups i.e. 18. Mostly catheter was removed on 21 to 30 day as keeping catheter for long duration would increase the chances of infection. Thus, it can be seen that stricture in membranous urethral is the most common site in the stricture involving the posterior urethra. Conclusion: Various modalities of treatment have evolved over the years, primary suturing, endoscopic realignment and initial SPC followed by delayed anastomosis for posterior urethral stricture which is considered as gold standard. 33.6 % of posterior urethral stricture was in the age group of 21-30 yrs. Pelvic injuries were responsible for 67.27% of posterior urethral stricture. Perineal approach has been proven to be the best approach since it preserves the neurovascular bundles hence there are lower chances of impotence, restenosis.

Background & Method: The aim of present study is to evaluate the stricture of posterior urethra before& after ‘U’ shape urethroplasty by uroflowmetry, RCU/MCU, patient satisfaction and Urethroscopy. The detailed history and physical examination will be carried out. Dye studies will be done both pre and postoperatively. Then patient satisfaction will be noted both objectively and subjectively and patient will be counselled for urethroscopic examination postoperatively. Result: The youngest patient was 10 years old and the oldest was 68 years. From the above table it is seen that maximum no. of cases (33.6 %) belong to 21-30 years age groups i.e. 18. Mostly catheter was removed on 21 to 30 day as keeping catheter for long duration would increase the chances of infection. Thus, it can be seen that stricture in membranous urethral is the most common site in the stricture involving the posterior urethra. Conclusion: Various modalities of treatment have evolved over the years, primary suturing, endoscopic realignment and initial SPC followed by delayed anastomosis for posterior urethral stricture which is considered as gold standard. 33.6 % of posterior urethral stricture was in the age group of 21-30 yrs. Pelvic injuries were responsible for 67.27% of posterior urethral stricture. Perineal approach has been proven to be the best approach since it preserves the neurovascular bundles hence there are lower chances of impotence, restenosis.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Stricture, Posterior, Uroflowmetry, RCU/MCU & Urethroscopy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?