Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Modern language models refute Chomsky's approach to language

Authors: Steven T. Piantadosi;

Modern language models refute Chomsky's approach to language

Abstract

Modern machine learning has subverted and bypassed the theoretical frameworkof Chomsky’s generative approach to linguistics, including its core claims to particular insights, principles, structures, and processes. I describe the sense in whichmodern language models implement genuine theories of language, and I highlightthe links between these models and approaches to linguistics that are based ongradient computations and memorized constructions. I also describe why thesemodels undermine strong claims for the innateness of language and respond toseveral critiques of large language models, including arguments that they can’t answer “why” questions and skepticism that they are informative about real life acquisition. Most notably, large language models have attained remarkable successat discovering grammar without using any of the methods that some in linguisticsinsisted were necessary for a science of language to progress.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average