Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

A Comparative Study of Displaced Intra-Articular Fractures of Calcaneum Treated by Extensile Lateral Versus Sinus Tarsi Approach

Authors: Sriram Sundararajan; Mukesh Dwivedi; Shubham Shah;

A Comparative Study of Displaced Intra-Articular Fractures of Calcaneum Treated by Extensile Lateral Versus Sinus Tarsi Approach

Abstract

Introduction: Currently, Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) through the ExtensileLateral approach is considered the most widely accepted surgical procedure for displacedintra- articular calcaneal fracture. Minimally invasive reduction and fixation techniques viaSinus Tarsi approach (STA) have been developed in attempts to avoid potentialcomplications associated with an extensile lateral approach, The purpose of this study is toevaluate functional and clinical outcome of displaced intra- articular fractures of calcaneum(DIACF) treated by using Extensile Lateral and Sinus Tarsi approaches.Materials and Methods: This study was carried out in GMERS Medical College andGeneral Hospital Gotri Vadodara from August 2020 to May 2022, consisting of total 42patients of intra-articular fractures of calcaneum. This was a comparative prospective study.All the patients were operated by surgeons experienced in both the approaches.Results: Majority were male patients with mean age of 37 years and had history of fall fromheight as mode of injury and had unilateral calcaneum fracture. 90.5% of patients for STapproach were operated within 4 days of admission as compared to 61.9% of patients for ELapproach who were operated within 4-6 days of admission. Days of hospitalization weremore for EL compared to ST group with significant difference (P<0.005) Functionaloutcome at 24 weeks by AOFAS scoring system depends on fracture pattern and approachused for it. AOFAS score 78/100 for ST approach for Sanders type 2 and 75/100 for ELapproach for Sanders type 3. EL group had more complications in the form of plate removaldue to infection, skin necrosis or wound dehiscence as compared to ST group.Conclusion: Our study showed better results for Sander's Type II Calcaneal fractures bySinus Tarsi approach and better results for Sander's Type III Calcaneal fractures byExtensile Lateral approach.

Introduction: Currently, Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) through the ExtensileLateral approach is considered the most widely accepted surgical procedure for displacedintra- articular calcaneal fracture. Minimally invasive reduction and fixation techniques viaSinus Tarsi approach (STA) have been developed in attempts to avoid potentialcomplications associated with an extensile lateral approach, The purpose of this study is toevaluate functional and clinical outcome of displaced intra- articular fractures of calcaneum(DIACF) treated by using Extensile Lateral and Sinus Tarsi approaches.Materials and Methods: This study was carried out in GMERS Medical College andGeneral Hospital Gotri Vadodara from August 2020 to May 2022, consisting of total 42patients of intra-articular fractures of calcaneum. This was a comparative prospective study.All the patients were operated by surgeons experienced in both the approaches.Results: Majority were male patients with mean age of 37 years and had history of fall fromheight as mode of injury and had unilateral calcaneum fracture. 90.5% of patients for STapproach were operated within 4 days of admission as compared to 61.9% of patients for ELapproach who were operated within 4-6 days of admission. Days of hospitalization weremore for EL compared to ST group with significant difference (P<0.005) Functionaloutcome at 24 weeks by AOFAS scoring system depends on fracture pattern and approachused for it. AOFAS score 78/100 for ST approach for Sanders type 2 and 75/100 for ELapproach for Sanders type 3. EL group had more complications in the form of plate removaldue to infection, skin necrosis or wound dehiscence as compared to ST group.Conclusion: Our study showed better results for Sander's Type II Calcaneal fractures bySinus Tarsi approach and better results for Sander's Type III Calcaneal fractures byExtensile Lateral approach.

Keywords

Calcaneum Fractures, Extensile Lateral Approach, Extensile Lateral Approach, Sinus Tarsi Approach, Calcaneum Fractures., Sinus Tarsi Approach

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 4
    download downloads 8
  • 4
    views
    8
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
4
8
Green
Related to Research communities