Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

CRAFT-OA Deliverable 5.1 Scalable and Adjustable Documentation of How to Understand the Aggregators' Technical Requirements

Authors: Gingold, Arnaud; Cuel-Oller, Nathan;

CRAFT-OA Deliverable 5.1 Scalable and Adjustable Documentation of How to Understand the Aggregators' Technical Requirements

Abstract

The Task (T) 5.1 of the CRAFT-OA project addresses the topic of the academic publications indexing from the point of view of the publishers, especially the Open Access Diamond Journals (OADJs). OADJs do not always match the requirements of the main indexing services, either because of their own technical capacities, or because of the biases of the indexes. The task’s objective is to help OADJs to know more about the indexes’ requirements and to better understand the global landscape of academic publications indexing. The main output of the task will be a synthetic documentation about a large set of indexing services, containing structured and comparable information, alongside useful links to more in-depth technical documentation. In this way, the T5.1 documentation will help OADJs to improve both their knowledge of technical requirements and their awareness of all the indexing possibilities for their contents. In particular, the documentation will bring a clearer identification of the different types of services concretely operating academic publications indexing (e.g., search engines, catalogues, directories, etc.). Furthermore, the extensive documentation will describe the indexing services based not only on prestige criteria, but also, for instance, on interoperability, additional services, or bibliodiversity criteria. In order to build the documentation, the T5.1 started with the analysis of existing academic indexes lists to extract useful analytical categories. This work resulted in a Knowledge Base (KB) about a first series of indexes, using an identical structure for all the indexes. This set of organized information served then as a source for the creation of the documentation itself. The documentation aims at presenting the information stored in the KB in a more user-friendly and explicit way, corresponding to either explanation of the KB content, or selection within this content. The current work represents a first version of the documentation, which will be refined and finalized until the end of the project. The documentation, and potentially the KB, are meant to be integrated in the Living handbook that is being currently developed by CRAFT-OA Work Package (WP) 7. This deliverable is currently under review by the EC.

Keywords

Diamond OA, Indexation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average